[1]何佩佩 邹 雄.论生态文明视野下环境利益的法律保障[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):065.
　HE Pei-pei,ZOU Xiong.Legal Protection of Environmental Benefits from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(02):065.
点击复制

论生态文明视野下环境利益的法律保障
分享到：

《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
065
栏目:
法制现代化研究
出版日期:
2015-04-14

文章信息/Info

Title:
Legal Protection of Environmental Benefits from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization
作者:
何佩佩 邹 雄*
福州大学法学院,350108;
Author(s):
HE Pei-pei;  ZOU Xiong
关键词:
生态文明;  环境利益;  法律保障;  法律体系
Keywords:
ecological civilization;  environmental benefits;  legal protection;  legal system
摘要:
在生态文明社会背景下,环境利益亟待纳入法律保障范围,以确保人类社会的可持续发展。而若想实现对环境利益的全面保障,有赖于整个法律体系即宪法、环境法以及其他传统部门法的有效的分工、配合,其中环境法是以保障环境利益为其根本追求的独立的部门法。为法律所保障的环境利益分为“强保障环境利益”与“弱保障环境利益”,构建生态文明社会既要关注环境权利、环境权力以及相应的环境义务对“强保障环境利益”的保障,也要关注对“弱保障环境利益”保障机制的研究。
Abstract:
In the context of an ecological civilization, it is urgent to incorporate environmental benefits into the scope of legal protection to ensure the sustainable development of human society. Overall protection of environmental benefits is based on the coordination and cooperation between the Constitution, Environmental Law and other specific laws. As an independent specific law, Environmental Law is set for protecting environmental benefits, namely, benefits under strong protection and benefits under weak protection. To build an ecological civilization, we must pay close attention to the protection of environmental benefits under strong protection through striking a good balance between environmental rights, power and obligations and to the protection mechanism for environmental benefits under weak protection.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹孟勤*.论马克思主义人学视域中生态文明建设主体自身的文明[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):067.
　CAO Meng-qin.Civilizing the Constructor of Ecological Civilization:From the Perspective of Marx’s Concept of Man[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):067.
[2]宋宇文*.论生态文明建设中环境利益的类型与法律保护机制——基于庞德利益理论的视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):074.
　SONG Yu-wen.Types of Environmental Interests and Legal Protection Mechanism inEcological Civilization Construction: From the Perspective ofPound’s Theory of Interests[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):074.
[3]刘 魁 张苏强.有机马克思主义“中国引领论”的哲学反思[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):005.
　LIU Kui,ZHANG Su-qiang.Organic Marxism and Its Proposal of“ China’s Leadership” inBuilding Ecological Civilization：A Philosophical Critique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):005.
[4]邵从清.辩证法视域下中国生态文明的国际话语建构[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):012.
　SHAO Cong-qing.Building a Discourse on Chinese Ecological Civilization for the GlobalAudience：A Proposal from the Perspective of Dialectics[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):012.
[5]董前程.中国特色社会主义生态文明理论的伦理意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(06):083.
　DONG Qiancheng.Ethical Implications of the Theory of Socialist Ecological Civilizationwith Chinese Characteristics[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(02):083.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 何佩佩,福州大学法学院讲师,福州大学法学院博士研究生,350108; 邹雄,福州大学法学院教授、博士生导师,350108。本文系福建省社会科学规划重点项目“我国环境保护法律体系重构研究”(2012A010)的部分研究成果。①上世纪末我国开始有学者关注“环境利益”这一主题,但当时多数学者将“环境利益”当成必然的、不证自明的概念在其论述中进行直接使用,并未深究其确切含义。自本世纪始,开始有学者就环境利益的概念、特征、构成要件、性质等相关基本理论展开研究,但现有研究成果从数量上看并不丰富; 而从内容上看,则呈现研究深入度不够、体系性较差、空白点较多、观点各异且未形成交锋等现状。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-04-14