[1]姜迎春.论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(02):018.
　JIANG Ying-chun.The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(02):018.
点击复制

论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年02期
页码:
018
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-04-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory
作者:
姜迎春*
南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心,210093
Author(s):
JIANG Ying-chun
关键词:
马克思;  异化劳动;  人的需要;  人学价值
Keywords:
Marx;  alienated labor;  human needs;  homonological value
摘要:
实现人的全面发展是马克思主义全部理论的价值诉求,而异化劳动理论是马克思自身思想变革的重要环节。该理论揭示了资本主义条件下人的片面发展和价值贬值的多重表现和内在根源,其关注的核心问题就是人的问题,包括人的价值、人的需要、人的解放以及人与自然的关系等问题,而对这些问题的研究则构成了马克思主义人学理论的基本框架。正是从人的全面发展这个价值诉求出发,马克思揭示了扬弃人的自我异化的人学主旨,即超越人的工具理性、从人的片面发展向全面发展的人学价值。而在当代中国,这也正是理解和汲取马克思异化劳动理论人学价值的意义所在,即增强坚持马克思主义劳动观的自觉性,尊重劳动与劳动者以及创造劳动者价值实现的生产劳动与生活环境,进而为中国特色社会主义的道路自信、制度自信和理论自信奠定坚实的人学基础。
Abstract:
To achieve a comprehensive development of human beings is the value pursuit of Marxist theory as a whole, but the alienated labor theory is the core link in the transformation of Marx’s thoughts. This theory reveals various forms of and causes for the unbalanced development of human beings and their devaluation under capitalist conditions. Thus, the theory of alienated labor is homological in nature, which covers the issues like human value, human needs, human liberation, and the relationship between man and nature. The research on these issues constitutes the basic framework of Marx’s homonological theory. It is from the perspective of pursuing a balanced development of human beings that Marx revealed the humanistic theme of sublating the alienation, which means rising above man’s instrumental rationality and moving from an unbalanced development to a balanced one. In contemporary China, this is where the meaning of understanding and learning from this theory lies. We have to promote our initiative in sticking to Marx’s theory of labor, respect the labor and laborers, and create favorable living and working conditions for them, thus laying a solid homological foundation for our confidence in the road, system and theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 燕.论马克思“否定的幸福观”及其实践智慧——以亚当·沙夫的幸福方法论为视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):012.
　WANG Yan.Marx’ “Negative” View on Happiness and His Practical Wisdom: From the Perspective of Adam Schaff’s Methodology of Happiness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(02):012.
[2]韩秀景.论马克思人学思想的生态本质[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(03):005.
　HAN Xiu-jing.Ecological Essence of Marx’s Theory of Human Nature[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(02):005.
[3]郑 飞*.从异化到物化：马克思的现代性社会关系批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):019.
　ZHENG Fei.From Alienation to Reification：A Logical Transformation of Marx’sCritique of Modern Social Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):019.
[4]罗 健*.马克思社会有机体理论总体性方法与全面深化改革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):032.
　LUO Jian.Totality Method of Marx’s Social Organism Theory and DeepeningReform Comprehensively in China Today[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(02):032.
[5]于 翔*.马克思关于人“自由的自觉的活动”思想精髓及其现实价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):011.
　YU Xiang.Essence and Practical Value of Marx’s Thoughts on“Free and Conscious Activities”[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(02):011.
[6]刘 军 侯春兰.马克思现代性批判思想的双重维度和方法论特征[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):072.
　LIU Jun,PhD in philosophy,is Professor and PhD Supervisor at School of Marxism,et al.Double Dimensions and Methodological Features of Marx’s ModernityCritique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(02):072.
[7]张 娥.马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(04):115.
　ZHANG E.The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(02):115.
[8]吴宏政.论马克思世界历史“周期率”论的整体逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(06):074.
　WU Hongzheng.The Overall Logic of Marx's Theory of the Cyclical Pattern of World History[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(02):074.
[9]程从柱.马克思“现实的个人”思想的教育哲学意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(02):041.
　CHENG Congzhu.The Implications of Marx's Thought of “Real Individual” for Education Philosophy[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(02):041.
[10]孙建华.马克思历史结构中主体思想对主体性思想政治教育的启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(03):072.
　SUN Jianhua.Implications of Marx's Thought on Subjectivity in Historical Structure for Ideological and Political Education on Subjectivity[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(02):072.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 哲学博士,南京大学马克思主义社会理论研究中心、哲学系教授、博士生导师,210093。本文系为纪念《1844年经济学哲学手稿》诞生170周年而作,也系国家社科基金项目(10BKS031)的中期成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-04-15