[1]张 娥.马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(04):115-122.
 ZHANG E.The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(04):115-122.
点击复制

马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
115-122
栏目:
马克思主义研究
出版日期:
2019-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook
作者:
张 娥
浙江大学马克思主义学院(杭州310028)
Author(s):
ZHANG E
关键词:
马克思“第三类文本”恩格斯《德法年鉴》
Keywords:
Marx the third type of text Engels Germany-France Yearbook
摘要:
以思想与现实的粘合度为依据,马克思的文本可以被划分为四类,报刊文章属于“第三类文本”。“第三类文本”与其他文本相比,兼具思想形成价值和传播价值,文本传播过程中产生的社会效应是判断其价值的重要指标。国内外学者高度评价《德法年鉴》中马克思发表文章的思想价值,但恩格斯晚年《在马克思墓前的讲话》中提到马克思一生参与的众多报刊时,却“遗漏”了《德法年鉴》。可能的解释是他考虑到《德法年鉴》传播效应缺失而进行了取舍。因为《德法年鉴》在传播之初遭遇“夭折”致使其社会效应大大减弱,未能充分发挥对无产阶级革命的方向引领作用,从而影响了恩格斯对其价值的评判。
Abstract:
According to the adhesion between thought and reality, Marx’s texts can be divided into fourcategories, and his newspaper articles belong to the third type of texts. Compared with other texts, the thirdtype of texts has the significance in showing how his thoughts were formed and spread, and the social effectproduced in the process of text dissemination is an important indicator to determine its value. Academicsat home and abroad spoke highly of the ideological value of Marx’s articles published in Germany-FranceYearbook, but when Engels mentioned in his speech at Marx’s tomb in his later years that Marx participatedin contributing articles to and editing many newspapers and magazines, he“ omitted” the Germany-FranceYearbook. A possible explanation for this“ omission” is that when he selected the works to mention, he tookthe communication effect as an important criterion. Because its“ death in infancy” caused its social effect tobe greatly weakened, the German-French Yearbook failed to give full play to the direction of the proletarianrevolution, and thus influenced the evaluation of its value by Engels.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜迎春.论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(02):018.
 JIANG Ying-chun.The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(04):018.
[2]王 燕.论马克思“否定的幸福观”及其实践智慧——以亚当·沙夫的幸福方法论为视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):012.
 WANG Yan.Marx’ “Negative” View on Happiness and His Practical Wisdom: From the Perspective of Adam Schaff’s Methodology of Happiness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(04):012.
[3]韩秀景.论马克思人学思想的生态本质[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(03):005.
 HAN Xiu-jing.Ecological Essence of Marx’s Theory of Human Nature[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(04):005.
[4]郑 飞*.从异化到物化:马克思的现代性社会关系批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):019.
 ZHENG Fei.From Alienation to Reification:A Logical Transformation of Marx’sCritique of Modern Social Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(04):019.
[5]罗 健*.马克思社会有机体理论总体性方法与全面深化改革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):032.
 LUO Jian.Totality Method of Marx’s Social Organism Theory and DeepeningReform Comprehensively in China Today[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(04):032.
[6]于 翔*.马克思关于人“自由的自觉的活动”思想精髓及其现实价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):011.
 YU Xiang.Essence and Practical Value of Marx’s Thoughts on“Free and Conscious Activities”[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(04):011.
[7]刘 军 侯春兰.马克思现代性批判思想的双重维度和方法论特征[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):072.
 LIU Jun,PhD in philosophy,is Professor and PhD Supervisor at School of Marxism,et al.Double Dimensions and Methodological Features of Marx’s ModernityCritique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(04):072.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
张娥,浙江大学马克思主义学院博士研究生(杭州310028)。
ZHANG E is PhD Candidate at School of Marxism, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou210028).
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-25