[1]孙建华.马克思历史结构中主体思想对主体性思想政治教育的启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(03):072-82.
 SUN Jianhua.Implications of Marx's Thought on Subjectivity in Historical Structure for Ideological and Political Education on Subjectivity[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(03):072-82.
点击复制

马克思历史结构中主体思想对主体性思想政治教育的启示
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
072-82
栏目:
马克思主义研究
出版日期:
2024-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Implications of Marx's Thought on Subjectivity in Historical Structure for Ideological and Political Education on Subjectivity
作者:
孙建华
Author(s):
SUN Jianhua
关键词:
马克思历史结构主体思想主体性思想政治教育
Keywords:
Marx historical structure subjectivity thought ideological and political education on subjectivity
摘要:
马克思历史结构中主体思想以资本逻辑批判为底板,将主体置于历史结构之中,它认为主体性、主体间性和公共性是在生产方式的历史运动中生成与建构的。它揭示了历史变迁的内在机理,启示主体性思想政治教育走进时代深处,紧扣生产方式矛盾运动把握百年变局的堂奥。这一思想为主体性思想政治教育的展开方式确立了思想路标。主体性思想政治教育要将观念批判与实践推进相结合,展开其新时代的运行逻辑,让主体间交往与投身社会实践相统一,在“两个大局”中确立其历史任务。
Abstract:
Marx's thought on the subjectivity in historical structure is based on its critique of the logic of capital, placing the subject into the historical structure. It posits that subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and publicity are generated and constructed through the historical movement of the mode of production. This thought reveals the internal mechanism of historical changes and inspires ideological and political education on subjectivity to delve deep into the reality of the contemporary era, closely aligning with the contradictions in the movement of the mode of production to grasp the profound changes unseen over the past century. This thought has established an intellectual roadmap for the development of ideological and political education on subjectivity. It suggests that such education should combine ideological critique with practical advancement, unfolding its operational logic in the new era, and unifying intersubjective interaction with social practice involvement, thereby establishing its historical mission by coordinating the domestic and international situations.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜迎春.论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(02):018.
 JIANG Ying-chun.The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(03):018.
[2]王 燕.论马克思“否定的幸福观”及其实践智慧——以亚当·沙夫的幸福方法论为视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):012.
 WANG Yan.Marx’ “Negative” View on Happiness and His Practical Wisdom: From the Perspective of Adam Schaff’s Methodology of Happiness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(03):012.
[3]韩秀景.论马克思人学思想的生态本质[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(03):005.
 HAN Xiu-jing.Ecological Essence of Marx’s Theory of Human Nature[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(03):005.
[4]郑 飞*.从异化到物化:马克思的现代性社会关系批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):019.
 ZHENG Fei.From Alienation to Reification:A Logical Transformation of Marx’sCritique of Modern Social Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(03):019.
[5]罗 健*.马克思社会有机体理论总体性方法与全面深化改革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):032.
 LUO Jian.Totality Method of Marx’s Social Organism Theory and DeepeningReform Comprehensively in China Today[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(03):032.
[6]于 翔*.马克思关于人“自由的自觉的活动”思想精髓及其现实价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):011.
 YU Xiang.Essence and Practical Value of Marx’s Thoughts on“Free and Conscious Activities”[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(03):011.
[7]刘 军 侯春兰.马克思现代性批判思想的双重维度和方法论特征[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):072.
 LIU Jun,PhD in philosophy,is Professor and PhD Supervisor at School of Marxism,et al.Double Dimensions and Methodological Features of Marx’s ModernityCritique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(03):072.
[8]张 娥.马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(04):115.
 ZHANG E.The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(03):115.
[9]吴宏政.论马克思世界历史“周期率”论的整体逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(06):074.
 WU Hongzheng.The Overall Logic of Marx's Theory of the Cyclical Pattern of World History[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(03):074.
[10]程从柱.马克思“现实的个人”思想的教育哲学意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(02):041.
 CHENG Congzhu.The Implications of Marx's Thought of “Real Individual” for Education Philosophy[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(03):041.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
孙建华,法学博士,苏州大学马克思主义学院院长、教授、博士生导师,江苏省习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究中心苏州大学基地研究员(苏州215123)。本文系国家社科基金重大项目“马克思主义中国化‘两个结合’及其关系研究”(21&ZD009)阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-06-25