[1]夏伟.监察体制改革“纪法衔接”的法理阐释及实现路径[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2020,(01):120-130.
　XIA Wei.Jurisprudential Interpretation of and Approaches to“Coherence between Discipline and Law”in Supervision System Reform[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2020,(01):120-130.
点击复制

监察体制改革“纪法衔接”的法理阐释及实现路径
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年01期
页码:
120-130
栏目:
法学：深化国家监察体制改革研究专题
出版日期:
2020-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Jurisprudential Interpretation of and Approaches to“Coherence between Discipline and Law”in Supervision System Reform
作者:
夏伟
中国政法大学刑事司法学院
Author(s):
XIA Wei
关键词:
监察体制改革; 纪法衔接; 法治反腐; 规则体系化
Keywords:
supervision system reform;  coherence between discipline and law;  lawbased anticorruption;  systematization of rules
摘要:
以监察体制改革为界线，党纪与国法之间的关系经历了从“纪法分离”到“纪法衔接”的变迁历程。法治反腐不能仅依靠国法，因为法的空缺性决定其腐败预防的不及时性及腐败治理的不全面性；而法的开放结构，又为国法接纳党纪，共同服务于法治反腐实践奠定了法理根基。在坚持法治反腐理念的前提下，充分利用中国特色反腐实践过程中积累的党纪资源优势，促进“纪法衔接”，是监察体制改革全面深化阶段的重要目标。在法治反腐意义上，党纪与国法之间不具有可比较性，因此，不论是强调“党纪高于国法”还是认为“国法高于党纪”，都是伪命题。正确发挥党纪与国法在法治反腐中的功能，就必须要以两者为基本素材，构建体系化的法治反腐规则。
Abstract:
Taking supervision system reform as the milestone, the relationship between party discipline and national law has undergone the change from “separation between discipline and law” to “coherence between discipline and law”. The anticorruption based on rule of law cannot only rely on the national law itself, because the absence of law means the lack of timely corruption prevention and incompleteness in corruption governance. The open structure of the law has laid a jurisprudential foundation for the acceptance of the party discipline in the national law, which will jointly contribute to the lawbased anticorruption practice. Under the premise of adhering to the concept of lawbased anticorruption, making full use of the advantages of the party discipline resources accumulated in the process of anticorruption practice and promoting the “coherence between discipline and law” are the important objectives for us to achieve in the stage of comprehensively deepening supervision system reform. In the sense of lawbased anticorruption, the party discipline cannot compare with the national law. Therefore, it is false to emphasize that “party discipline is superior to national law” or that “national law is superior to party discipline”. In order to give full play to the functions of both the party discipline and the national law in the lawbased anticorruption, we must take them both as the basic materials to build systematic anticorruption rules based on rule of law.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘艳红 刘浩.政务处分法对监察体制改革的法治化推进[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2020,(01):005.
　LIU Yanhong,LIU Hao.Law on Governmental Sanctions for Public Employees:Promotion of Rule of Law in Supervision System Reform[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2020,(01):005.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
夏伟，法学博士，中国政法大学刑事司法学院讲师（北京100088）。本文受中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划资助。About the author：XIA Wei, PhD in Law, is Lecturer at School of Criminal Justice, China University of Political Science and Law(Beijing 100088).
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-02-15