«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2022年01期

页码:

037-46

栏目:

出版日期:

2022-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

The Reform to “Delegate Powers, Improve Regulation, and Strengthen Services” in Higher Education: The Dilemma and Its Solution

作者:

姚 荣

Author(s):

YAO Rong

关键词:

高等教育领域;  “放管服”改革;  行政性分权;  规范主义;  功能主义

Keywords:

higher education sphere;  reform to “delegate powers;  improve regulation;  and strengthen services”;  administrative decentralization;  prescriptivism;  functionalism

摘要:

近年来,为突破制约高等教育改革发展的体制机制壁垒,激活高校面向社会依法自主办学的活力,中央政府发布了一系列关于高等教育领域“放管服”改革的新政。然而,受行政性分权格局与内部行政关系传统的束缚,我国高等教育领域“放管服”改革仍然面临着政府“放不下”与高校“接不住”的两难困境。中央与地方各有关涉教部门以及高校,对于“放管服”改革的利益分歧与观念冲突,直接衍生出改革意愿不足、实质性突破缺乏与制度空间约束等问题,折射出“政策驱动型”改革模式的弊病与限度。当前,亟待统筹规范主义与功能主义两种改革进路,促进政府与高校分权从行政性分权向法律分权与功能分权转变,以实现政府依法有效监管能力与高校依法有效治理能力的协同提升,并最终破解“放管服”改革的两难困境。

Abstract:

In recent years, in order to break through the institutional barriers restricting the reform and development of higher education, and to activate the vitality of colleges and universities to operate independently according to the needs of society and in accordance with the law, the central government has issued a series of new policies on the reform to “delegate powers, improve regulation, and strengthen services” in the field of higher education. However, bound by the pattern of the distribution of administrative power and the tradition of internal administrative relations, this reform is still facing the following dilemma: on the one hand, the government is unable to delegate powers, and on the other the higher education institutes are unable to assume the delegated powers. The central and local education-related departments and universities have divergent interests and conflicting ideas about the reform, which has directly resulted in insufficient reform willingness, lack of substantial breakthroughs, and institutional space constraints, which reflect the disadvantages and limitations of the “policy-driven” reform model. At present, it is urgent to coordinate the two reform approaches of prescriptivism and functionalism to promote the transformation of the power distribution between the government and the university from an administrative decentralization to a legal and functional decentralization, so as to achieve the coordinated improvement of the government’s ability to effectively supervise and the universities’ ability to effectively govern in accordance with the law, and ultimately to solve the dilemma mentioned above.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

姚荣,管理学博士,华东师范大学高等教育研究所副教授(上海200062)。本文系上海市教育法学人才培养计划项目“高校法治秩序建构的国际经验与中国探索”(2022JYFXR056)的研究成果。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01