[1]刘业进.高等教育“放管服”改革的三张清单:权力清单、责任清单与负面清单[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2020,(02):053-67.
　LIU Yejin.Three Lists of Reform in China’s Higher Education:About What Can, Should and Cannot Be Done[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2020,(02):053-67.
点击复制

高等教育“放管服”改革的三张清单:权力清单、责任清单与负面清单
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2020年02期
页码:
053-67
栏目:
教育学研究
出版日期:
2020-03-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Three Lists of Reform in China’s Higher Education:About What Can, Should and Cannot Be Done
作者:
刘业进
首都经济贸易大学城市经济公共管理学院(北京100070)
Author(s):
LIU Yejin
关键词:
高等教育;  “放管服”改革;  权力清单;  责任清单;  负面清单
Keywords:
higher education;  reform of “release;  governance and service”;  list of powers;  list of responsibilities;  negative list
摘要:
我国高等教育改革正经历从“管办评分离”到“放管服”纵深推进,但迄今为止,推出的政策举措仍囿于教育行政部门放权微调和落实高校办学自主权正面清单的改革思路。本文澄清并提出,高等教育领域“放管服”改革的目标是依照“法无授权不可为”“法无禁止皆可为”的法治精神建立现代大学制度; 具有实质性含义的改革举措在于落实三张清单:教育行政管理部门的权力清单、责任清单; 以及有关高校“不得如何”的禁令性规定的“负面清单”和教育评价组织自主权的“负面清单”。
Abstract:
China’s reform in higher education is moving from the stage of “separation between administration, operation and evaluation” to the new stage of “streamlining administration and delegating powers, strengthening regulation, and improving services”(known as “release, governance and service”). However, the policy initiatives are still confined to the ideas of decentralization, fine-tuning and the implementation of the positive list of university autonomy. This paper is intended to clarify and put forward that the goal of the reform characterized by “release, governance and service” in the field of higher education is to establish a modern university system in accordance with the spirit of “nothing can be done without the authorization of the law” and “anything can be done if not prohibited by the law”. The success in achieving a substantive reform depends on the implementation of the following three lists:the list of governmental power and responsibility concerning educational affairs; the negative list of prohibitive provisions on “what is not allowed” in colleges and universities and the negative list concerning the autonomy of educational evaluation organizations.

相似文献/References:

[1]王建华*.如何重建我们时代的高等教育[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(02):085.
　WANG Jian-hua.How to Recreate Higher Education in Our Era[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(02):085.
[2]李 均 何伟光*.应用型本科大学40 年：历史、特征与变革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(05):043.
　LI Jun,HE Wei-guang.History, Characteristics and Reform of China’s AppliedUndergraduate Universities in the Past 40 Years[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(02):043.
[3]方 芳 刘泽云*.高等教育投入模式的国际比较研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(06):040.
　FANG Fang,LIU Ze-yun.The Patterns of Investment in Higher Education: A Comparative Study[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(02):040.
[4]姚 荣.高等教育领域“放管服”改革的两难困境与破解策略[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(01):037.
　YAO Rong.The Reform to “Delegate Powers, Improve Regulation, and Strengthen Services” in Higher Education: The Dilemma and Its Solution[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(02):037.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
刘业进,管理学博士,首都经济贸易大学城市经济公共管理学院教授、博士生导师(北京100070)。本文系全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题“简政放权与推进教育管办评分离的制度改革设计研究”(DFA140222)研究成果。LIU Yejin, PhD in Management, is Profess and PhD Supervisor at School of Economics and Public Administration, Capital University of Economics and Business(Beijing 100070).
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-03-15