«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《南京师范大学学报（社会科学版）》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2017年03期

页码:

005

栏目:

马克思主义与当代世界

出版日期:

2017-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Sinicization of Marxism：Its Object System and Historical Openness

作者:

金民卿*

中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院，100732

Author(s):

JIN Min-qing

关键词:

马克思主义中国化; 客体; 马克思主义理论; 中国具体实际

Keywords:

sinicization of Marxism; object; basic principles of Marxism; Chinese concrete reality

摘要:

马克思主义中国化的客体，就是被纳入到马克思主义中国化的过程之中、被主体加以结合的对象，即马克思主义理论与中国具体实际，一个是理论客体，一个是实际客体。作为马克思主义中国化的客体，马克思主义从一开始就是作为指导思想而不是一般理论、是次生态而不是原生态、是以解决实践问题而不是以追求理论完整性为中心；中国具体实际是一个包括了民族特点、文化传统、国情状况等在内的总体性系统，对于这些客体要素的把握程度是判断马克思主义中国化发展程度高低的重要尺度。主客体之间、两类客体之间的互动发展，形成了马克思主义中国化的历史开放性。

Abstract:

The two key elements which are unified into an organic whole constitute the object of the Marxistsinicization：one is the Marxist theory and the other Chinese reality；the former is a theoretical entity andthe latter a concrete one. As an object of the Marxist sinicization，Marxism was introduced into China in itsderivative rather than original form and has since been accepted as a guideline rather than a universally-bindingtheory：its main purpose is thought to solve the concrete problems rather centering on the pursuit of theoreticalcompleteness. The Chinese reality is an overall system consisting of such elements as the national character，cultural tradition and basic national conditions. The extent to which all these elements are grasped by the subjectof sinicization forms the key yardstick of the sinicization of Marxism. The interaction between the subject andthe object and that between the two types of object determines that the sinicization of Marxism varies withdifferent historical conditions，hence its historical openness.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

* 哲学博士，中国社会科学院马克思主义研究院研究员、博士生导师，100732。本文是国家社科基金项目“马克思主义中国化的思想逻辑”（ 16FKS001）的研究成果。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-30