[1]宋夜雨.“摩罗”复现和“心声”再起——鲁迅早期的诗歌经验与《野草》的写作[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(01):157-168.
　SONG Yeyu.The Revival of “Mara Poet” and “Voice of the Heart”: Lu Xun's Early Poetic Experience and His Writing of Yecao[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(01):157-168.
点击复制

“摩罗”复现和“心声”再起——鲁迅早期的诗歌经验与《野草》的写作
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
157-168
栏目:
语言文学研究
出版日期:
2024-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Revival of “Mara Poet” and “Voice of the Heart”: Lu Xun's Early Poetic Experience and His Writing of Yecao
作者:
宋夜雨
Author(s):
SONG Yeyu
关键词:
鲁迅; 心声; 《野草》; 摩罗诗人; 诗歌经验
Keywords:
Lu Xun;  voice of the heart;  Yecao;  Mara poet;  poetic experience
摘要:
“声”对于鲁迅的文学起源具有重要的意义。留日早期，正是注意到“诗力”与“心声”之间的有机关联，鲁迅才弃医从文，进而投入“新生”的文学事业中；五四时期，随着一种文化政治的兴起，为了唤起更多的“真的声音”，一个“呐喊”的鲁迅也随之到来。可以说，“声”之探求构成了鲁迅人生展开的主要线索。如果说“呐喊”的鲁迅对应着一个外发性的启蒙自我，那么，《野草》的写作则意味着鲁迅经历了一次“声”的内转，即他通过自我内在声音的设定，完成了“心声”的找寻。在《野草》的写作过程中，鲁迅重新唤醒了早期的“心声”机制，“摩罗诗人”的重现不仅影响到了《野草》的写作方式，也参与到具体的文本构成。由此，鲁迅既重新“听得自己的心音”，也完成了自我的新生，进而以一种崭新的主体姿态投入对“无声的中国”的批判中。
Abstract:
“Sound” is of great significance to the literary origin of Lu Xun. In the early days of his stay in Japan, it was because he noticed the organic connection between “poetry” and the “voice of the heart” that Lu Xun gave up medicine to pursue literature and devoted himself to the literary cause of “pursuing a new life”, in order to arouse more “true voices”, a “shouting” Lu Xun also emerged. It can be said that the exploration of “sound” constitutes the main clue of the unfolding of Lu Xun's life. If the “shouting” Lu Xun corresponds to an external enlightenment self, the writing of Wild Grass(Yecao《野草》) means that Lu Xun has experienced an inward turn of the sound, that is, through the setting of his own inner voice, completed the search for the “voice of the heart”. In the process of writing Wild Grass, Lu Xun reawakened the early “voice” mechanism, and the re-emergence of “the Mara poet” not only affected the writing style of Wild Grass, but also involved in the specific text formation. Consequently, Lu Xun not only “listened to his heart” once more but also underwent a self-renewal, subsequently engaging in the critique of the “silent China” from a fresh subjective stance.

相似文献/References:

[1]曹清华*.位置与身份：左翼鲁迅的意义[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):154.
　CAO Qing-hua.Position and Identity: The Meaning of Leftist Lu Xun[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):154.
[2]张 娟*.《野草》中的“陌生人”世界和城市批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(06):126.
　ZHANG Juan.The Strangers’ World and Urban Criticism in Lu Xun’s Wild Grass[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(01):126.
[3]谭桂林.鲁迅疾病叙事与中国现代生命伦理的发生[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):005.
　TAN Guilin.Lu Xun’s Illness Narratives and the Emergence of Modern LifeEthics in China[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(01):005.
[4]陈莉,王宇平.虚词和近现代汉语史的分期问题[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(05):159.
　CHEN Li,WANG Yuping.Function Words and Determination of the Historical Stage of（Early）Modern Chinese Language[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(01):159.
[5]陈留生.从《呐喊·自序》到《野草·题辞》——鲁迅特定时段生命体验片谈[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(04):139.
　CHEN Liusheng.From “Preface to Nahan” to “Preface to Yecao”: A Discussion of Lu Xun's Life Experience During a Specific Period[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(01):139.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
宋夜雨，文学博士，山东大学文学院研究员（济南250100）。本文是国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“现代中国‘自我’的起源与早期新诗的兴起研究”（23FYB043）的研究性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-25