“不拘”与“纵情”——论《明儒学案》中黄宗羲对邓豁渠形象的建构-《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: “Uninhibited” and “Insouciant”: The Image of Deng HuoquConstructed by Huang Zongxi in his Mingru Xue an

摘要:: 通过对比《明儒学案》泰州学案前言邓豁渠传记与《南询录》《里中三异传》等内容，可以发现黄宗羲在编写《明儒学案》泰州学案前言邓豁渠传记部分时，对邓豁渠的事迹和思想做出了一定的删改与整理。包括摘取邓豁渠与其师赵大洲因思想分歧而不再相见的文献，却不选择《白苏斋类集》中邓豁渠与赵大洲是因与学术无关之事而交恶的说法等，同时黄宗羲也在参考邓豁渠的自传《南询录》的同时在文字上做出了许多带有用意的删改。黄宗羲特地将不受时人重视的邓豁渠放入泰州学案，为其做传、点评，他所塑造的一个“只主见性，不拘戒律”“纵情”的邓豁渠形象，暗含了黄宗羲对于邓豁渠以及泰州学派的态度，即认为他们不是阳明的正统继承者，也因此他们在思想上的偏误不需要阳明学人来解释、负责。

Abstract:: By comparing Mingru Xuean明儒学案(Intellectual Biographies of Ming Confucians )with other biographies of Deng Huoqu like those included in Nanxun Lu南询录(The Record of a Quest in the South)and Lizhong Sanyi Zhuan里中三异传(Biographies of Three Eccentrics in Lizhong), we found that Huang Zongxi created a wild image of Deng Huoqu by making some modifications to the records of his deeds and thoughts. For example, he chose the documents which relates that Deng Huoqu broke up with his teacher Zhao Dazhou because of their differences in thought, but ignored the view offered in Baisuzhai Leiji白苏斋类集(Classified Anthology of Baisuzhai)which records that they broke up their relationship for personal rather than academic reasons. At the same time, several words were found to have been deleted deliberately from Nanxun Lu by Huang Zongxi. Putting Deng Huoqu, who was not valued by his contemporaries, into Taizhou School, Huang Zongxi built an “uninhibited” and “insouciant” image for Deng. This suggests that in Huang s eyes Deng Huoqu was not a successor of Wang Yangming, so the scholars from Yangming School did not need to account for the mistakes made by Deng Huoqu and the Taizhou School.

备注/Memo:: 李一禾，浙江财经大学人文与传播学院讲师（杭州310018）；张如安，宁波大学人文学院教授（宁波315211）。本文系2019年度浙江省教育厅一般科研项目“《明儒学案·泰州学案·前言》文献整理与研究”（Y201942570）的研究成果。About the authors：LI Yihe is Lecturer at College of Humanities and Communication, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics(Hangzhou 310018); ZHANG Ruan is Professor at School of Humanities, Ningbo University(Ningbo 315211).