[1]吴宏政.论马克思世界历史“周期率”论的整体逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(06):074-81.
　WU Hongzheng.The Overall Logic of Marx's Theory of the Cyclical Pattern of World History[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(06):074-81.
点击复制

论马克思世界历史“周期率”论的整体逻辑
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
074-81
栏目:
马克思主义研究
出版日期:
2023-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Overall Logic of Marx's Theory of the Cyclical Pattern of World History
作者:
吴宏政
Author(s):
WU Hongzheng
关键词:
马克思;  世界历史;  “周期率”;  共产主义
Keywords:
Marx;  world history;  cyclical pattern;  communism
摘要:
马克思认为世界历史的发展趋势是实现共产主义,据此人类实现自由和解放。他把世界历史总体上划分为两大阶段,第一阶段是阶级社会阶段(史前史),并且是充满阶级斗争的历史; 第二阶段是阶级、国家、民族消亡的阶段,这后一个阶段是史前史的终结以及真正的世界历史的开始。但是,在第一阶段里,尽管生产力不断发展,生产关系也不断变化,但是由于生产力和生产关系的矛盾运动,总是导致一个“特殊阶级”推翻另一个“特殊阶级”,世界历史表现为循环往复的“周期率”。而随着资本主义矛盾的世界化,必然形成一个代表全人类共同利益的“普遍阶级”,这个阶级不再是以往的“特殊阶级”,因而能够作为世界历史的主体创造新的历史阶段,把世界历史带到阶级、国家和民族消亡的历史阶段,这便是公有制为基础的共产主义社会,从而在根本上消除了世界历史的“周期率”。
Abstract:
Marx believed that the developmental trend of world history is the realization of communism, through which humanity achieves freedom and liberation. He divided world history into two major phases: the first phase being the era of class societies(prehistory)characterized by intense class struggles, and the second phase being the period where classes, states, and nations fade away. This latter stage marks the end of prehistory and the true beginning of world history. However, in the first phase, despite continuous advancements in productive forces and evolving social relations, the inherent contradictions between productive forces and relations of production consistently led to one “particular class” overthrowing another “particular class”, resulting in a cyclical and repetitive “cyclical pattern” in world history. With the globalization of capitalist contradictions, there inevitably emerges a “universal class” representing the common interests of all humanity. This class is no longer a “particular class” as seen in the past, and it can thus act as the primary agent of world history, ushering in a new historical phase where class, state, and nationality fade away. This phase constitutes a communist society based on common ownership, fundamentally eliminating the “cyclical pattern” of world history.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜迎春.论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(02):018.
　JIANG Ying-chun.The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(06):018.
[2]王 燕.论马克思“否定的幸福观”及其实践智慧——以亚当·沙夫的幸福方法论为视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):012.
　WANG Yan.Marx’ “Negative” View on Happiness and His Practical Wisdom: From the Perspective of Adam Schaff’s Methodology of Happiness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(06):012.
[3]韩秀景.论马克思人学思想的生态本质[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(03):005.
　HAN Xiu-jing.Ecological Essence of Marx’s Theory of Human Nature[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(06):005.
[4]郑 飞*.从异化到物化：马克思的现代性社会关系批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):019.
　ZHENG Fei.From Alienation to Reification：A Logical Transformation of Marx’sCritique of Modern Social Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(06):019.
[5]罗 健*.马克思社会有机体理论总体性方法与全面深化改革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):032.
　LUO Jian.Totality Method of Marx’s Social Organism Theory and DeepeningReform Comprehensively in China Today[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(06):032.
[6]于 翔*.马克思关于人“自由的自觉的活动”思想精髓及其现实价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):011.
　YU Xiang.Essence and Practical Value of Marx’s Thoughts on“Free and Conscious Activities”[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(06):011.
[7]刘 军 侯春兰.马克思现代性批判思想的双重维度和方法论特征[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):072.
　LIU Jun,PhD in philosophy,is Professor and PhD Supervisor at School of Marxism,et al.Double Dimensions and Methodological Features of Marx’s ModernityCritique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(06):072.
[8]张 娥.马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(04):115.
　ZHANG E.The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(06):115.
[9]程从柱.马克思“现实的个人”思想的教育哲学意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(02):041.
　CHENG Congzhu.The Implications of Marx's Thought of “Real Individual” for Education Philosophy[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(06):041.
[10]孙建华.马克思历史结构中主体思想对主体性思想政治教育的启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(03):072.
　SUN Jianhua.Implications of Marx's Thought on Subjectivity in Historical Structure for Ideological and Political Education on Subjectivity[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(06):072.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
吴宏政,吉林大学马克思主义学院院长、教授、博士生导师(长春130012)。本文系教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“新时代大中小学思想政治理论课课程教材一体化建设研究”(20JDZ004)的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-25