[1]郎友兴 陈文文.“扩”与“缩”的共进：变革社会中社区治理单元的重构——以杭州市江干区“省级社区治理与公共服务创新试验区”为例[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):090-99.
　LANG Youxing,CHEN Wenwen.Rebuilding Community Governance Unit in a Transforming Society:The Coexistence of“ Enlarging” and“ Narrowing” ApproachesExemplified by the Practice of Jianggan District in Hangzhou[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(02):090-99.
点击复制

“扩”与“缩”的共进：变革社会中社区治理单元的重构——以杭州市江干区“省级社区治理与公共服务创新试验区”为例
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2019年02期
页码:
090-99
栏目:
政治学研究
出版日期:
2019-03-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rebuilding Community Governance Unit in a Transforming Society:The Coexistence of“ Enlarging” and“ Narrowing” ApproachesExemplified by the Practice of Jianggan District in Hangzhou
作者:
郎友兴 陈文文
浙江大学，杭州 310058
Author(s):
LANG Youxing;  CHEN Wenwen
LANG Youxing, PhD in political science, is Professor and PhD Supervisor at Schoolof Public Affairs, Zhejiang University ( Hangzhou 310058 ); CHEN Wenwen is PhD Candidate at School ofPublic Affairs, Zhejiang University ( Hangzhou 310058 ).
关键词:
社区治理; 治理单元; 联合社区; 邻里坊
Keywords:
community governance;  governance unit;  bigger community;  neighborhood workshop
摘要:
中国数十年社区建设有两条基本的路径（逻辑），一条是政党－国家（政府）中心论，另一条是社会-居民中心论。这两个路径造成社区治理过程中普遍存在的两个困顿。第一是社区居委会行政化之愈来愈彻底，或者日益被边缘化。第二是作为共同体的社区变成了行政区，居民参与度依然较低，认同程度低，形成了“夹生人”社会。因此，如何解决，或者是找出一个平衡点或突破口就显得相当重要了，现实迫使人们不得不把眼光转到治理单元的创新上来，各地做了不少探索。本文旨在展示出在已有的框架下杭州市江干区在社区治理与公共服务的实验过程中如何在两个看似反向的维度上同时进行创建以推进社区治理的水平。杭州市江干区通过一扩一缩（ 一大一小），扩的方面是建立“联合社区”，推行“大社区制”，旨在强化国家（政府）对基层社会的有效管理，缩的方面是建立“邻里坊”，旨在推进自治与居民的参与，对社区治理单元进行修缮性的重构，由此提升社区治理的水平。
Abstract:
There are two different approaches to community building in China for decades. One isadministrative and characterized by Party-state ( government ) centralism, and the other is society centralismfeaturing self-governance and people’s participation. These approaches have caused two major problems incommunity governance. Firstly, the community residents’ committees are increasingly becoming governmentlikeorgans or more and more marginalized. Secondly, the community as a Gemeinschaft has become anadministrative district, which depressed the resident’ sense of identity and their motivation for participation,forming a society of“ strangers” . In order to solve these problems, it is important to find a balance point orbreakthrough point to overcome the conflicts between these two approaches. Reality forces us to turn ourattention to the innovations in redefining the governance unit explored by many areas. To promote such aredefinition, this article aims to demonstrate an innovation of this type made by Jianggan District of HangzhouCity, which applies a double-track mode of governance in the existing framework adopted by the communitygovernance and public service experimental areas. One track ( in a top-down manner ) is to strengthen thecontrol and penetration of the state by building bigger communities and implementing a“ bigger communitysystem” , and the other one ( in a bottom-up manner ) is to advance self-governance and residents’ participationby establishing neighborhood workshops. These two tracks work together to help restructure the governanceunit and improve the community governance.

相似文献/References:

[1]高 红 宫 雪*.AGIL 框架下社区社会组织的功能系统与提升路径[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(03):025.
　GAO Hong,GONG Xue.Community Social Organizations Viewed from AGIL Framework：Their Function System and Approaches to Function Enhancement[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(02):025.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
郎友兴，政治学博士，浙江大学公共管理学院政治学系教授、博士生导师（杭州 310058）；陈文文，浙江大学公共管理学院博士研究生（杭州 310058）。本文系浙江大学文科专项课题“ ‘实验主义治理’框架下中国社区治理的机制创新：浙江省社区治理和服务创新实验之研究”的阶段性成果。作者就本文的内容曾分别在2017 年11 月由中国社会科学院政治学所主办的第四届“中国地方政府治理与社会治理学术研讨会”和2017 年12 月由中国人民大学国际关系学院政治学系主办的人大政治学论坛2017 暨“国家治理理论与现
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-30