[1]冉力文,成龙.重思马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的异化概念[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(04):090-97.
　RAN Liwen,Cheng Long.Rethinking the Concept of Alienation in Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(04):090-97.
点击复制

重思马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的异化概念
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年04期
页码:
090-97
栏目:
马克思主义研究
出版日期:
2024-08-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Rethinking the Concept of Alienation in Marx's Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844
作者:
冉力文; 成龙
Author(s):
RAN Liwen;  Cheng Long
关键词:
马克思; 异化; 《1844年经济学哲学手稿》; 《詹姆斯·穆勒〈政治经济学原理〉一书摘要》
Keywords:
Marx;  alienation;  Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844;  Exerpts from James Mill's “Elements of Political Economy”
摘要:
“异化”是马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的核心议题，但“异化”概念在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》的“第一笔记本”和“第三笔记本”中存在差异，《穆勒评注》构成“第一笔记本”和“第三笔记本”之间马克思异化观转换的中介。在“第一笔记本”中，马克思对异化劳动现象的积极批判遵循的是主客二分的自我异化逻辑，而并非费尔巴哈式消极异化概念的应用。马克思在《穆勒评注》中揭示出隐藏在经济关系背后的交往异化，力图以此扬弃“第一笔记本”中对异化劳动现象主客二分式的自我异化逻辑。在“第三笔记本”中，马克思将感性个人视为社会存在物，在社会场域的“对象性关系”中搭建起异化复归的实践逻辑，在对黑格尔哲学的重新关注中完善异化复归的理论逻辑，实现了对《穆勒评注》中异化逻辑的理论延续与现实超越。
Abstract:
“Alienation” is a central theme in Marx's Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. However, the concept of alienation differs between the “First Notebook” and the “Third Notebook” within the Manuscripts. The Comments on James Mill serve as an intermediary for the transition in Marx's views on alienation between these notebooks. In the “First Notebook”, Marx's critical approach to alienated labor adheres to a subject-object dichotomy of self-alienation logic, rather than applying Feuerbach's notion of passive alienation. In the Comments on James Mill, Marx uncovers communicative alienation hidden within economic relationships, attempting to transcend the subject-object dichotomy of self-alienation logic present in the “First Notebook”. In the “Third Notebook”, Marx regards the individual with personal sensation and feeling as a social being, constructing a practical logic for the return from alienation through “objective relations” within the social field. He refines the theoretical logic of returning from alienation by revisiting Hegel's philosophy, achieving a theoretical continuation and practical transcendence of the alienation logic discussed in his Comments on James Mill.

相似文献/References:

[1]姜迎春.论马克思异化劳动理论的人学价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(02):018.
　JIANG Ying-chun.The Homonological Value of Marx’s Alienated Labor Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(04):018.
[2]王 燕.论马克思“否定的幸福观”及其实践智慧——以亚当·沙夫的幸福方法论为视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):012.
　WANG Yan.Marx’ “Negative” View on Happiness and His Practical Wisdom: From the Perspective of Adam Schaff’s Methodology of Happiness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(04):012.
[3]韩秀景.论马克思人学思想的生态本质[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(03):005.
　HAN Xiu-jing.Ecological Essence of Marx’s Theory of Human Nature[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(04):005.
[4]罗 健*.马克思社会有机体理论总体性方法与全面深化改革[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):032.
　LUO Jian.Totality Method of Marx’s Social Organism Theory and DeepeningReform Comprehensively in China Today[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(04):032.
[5]于 翔*.马克思关于人“自由的自觉的活动”思想精髓及其现实价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):011.
　YU Xiang.Essence and Practical Value of Marx’s Thoughts on“Free and Conscious Activities”[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(04):011.
[6]刘 军 侯春兰.马克思现代性批判思想的双重维度和方法论特征[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):072.
　LIU Jun,PhD in philosophy,is Professor and PhD Supervisor at School of Marxism,et al.Double Dimensions and Methodological Features of Marx’s ModernityCritique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(04):072.
[7]张 娥.马克思“第三类文本”的传播效应——对恩格斯“遗漏”《德法年鉴》的一种解释[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(04):115.
　ZHANG E.The Spreading Effect of Marx’s“ the Third Type of Texts”: AnExplanation for Engels’s“ Omission” of the German-French Yearbook[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(04):115.
[8]吴宏政.论马克思世界历史“周期率”论的整体逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(06):074.
　WU Hongzheng.The Overall Logic of Marx's Theory of the Cyclical Pattern of World History[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(04):074.
[9]程从柱.马克思“现实的个人”思想的教育哲学意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(02):041.
　CHENG Congzhu.The Implications of Marx's Thought of “Real Individual” for Education Philosophy[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(04):041.
[10]孙建华.马克思历史结构中主体思想对主体性思想政治教育的启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(03):072.
　SUN Jianhua.Implications of Marx's Thought on Subjectivity in Historical Structure for Ideological and Political Education on Subjectivity[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(04):072.
[11]郑 飞*.从异化到物化：马克思的现代性社会关系批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):019.
　ZHENG Fei.From Alienation to Reification：A Logical Transformation of Marx’sCritique of Modern Social Relations[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(04):019.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
冉力文，浙江大学马克思主义学院博士生（杭州310058）；成龙，哲学博士，浙江大学马克思主义学院教授、博士生导师（杭州310058）。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-25