[1]李怀胜.网络犯罪治理的刑行衔接:基本价值与运作模式[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(03):099-111.
 LI Huaisheng.The Convergence of Criminal and Administrative Law Enforcement in Cybercrime Governance: Basic Value and Operation Pattern[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(03):099-111.
点击复制

网络犯罪治理的刑行衔接:基本价值与运作模式
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年03期
页码:
099-111
栏目:
法学研究
出版日期:
2023-06-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Convergence of Criminal and Administrative Law Enforcement in Cybercrime Governance: Basic Value and Operation Pattern
作者:
李怀胜
Author(s):
LI Huaisheng
关键词:
网络犯罪协同治理刑行衔接一体化责任
Keywords:
cybercrime collaborative governance convergence of criminal and administrative law enforcement integrated responsibility
摘要:
在网络犯罪的深度社会化和产业链特征的双重加持下,网络犯罪成为严峻的社会挑战。在此背景下,网络犯罪案件的刑行衔接作为一种治理机制,契合对网络犯罪进行溯源治理、过程治理与协同治理的需求,反电信网络诈骗、个人信息保护、新业态的风险管控等网络治理课题也需要贯通性的责任处置策略。网络犯罪刑行衔接的两种模式包括刑事判决生效后的“刑-行关联罚”以及未能实现有效刑事判决后再反向衔接的“行-刑补罚”,前者有助于实现法律责任的闭环而后者有助于司法解释中“多次行为入罪化”模式的实现。基于网络犯罪的产业链特征以及网络犯罪的协同治理需求,司法机关要对案件进行全链条审查,注重追究网络平台等犯罪案件“被害人”的行政责任。
Abstract:
Under dual effect of the deep socialization of cybercrime and its characteristic of industrial chain, cybercrime governance has become a severe social challenge. The difficulty in dealing with this challenge exceeds that of traditional crime. In this context, a reversed coherence mechanism of administrative and criminal law enforcement in policing cybercrime meets the needs of source governance, process governance and collaborative governance towards cybercrime. Issues for cyberspace governance like anti-telecom and online fraud, personal information protection, and risk management of new industry require a coherent strategy for determining legal responsibility as well. Two modes of reversing the coherence in administrative and criminal law enforcement are giving “related penalty” after the criminal judgment coming into force, and giving “supplementary penalty” after reversing the coherence due to the failure of conducting criminal sanction. The former is helpful to realize the closed loop of legal responsibility while the latter is conducive to realizing the mode of “criminalization of repeated acts” in judicial interpretation. Based on the characteristic of the industrial chain of cybercrime and the demand for collaborative governance of cybercrime, the judiciary should review the whole chain of cases and focus on the administrative responsibility of the “victims” of crimes such as the network platforms.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪海霞 郭维汉.法治视阈下社会协同治理的制度创新[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2013,(06):013.
 WANG Hai-xia,GUO Wei-han.System Innovation of Collaborative Governance in a Rule-of-Law Society[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2013,(03):013.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
李怀胜,法学博士,中国政法大学刑事司法学院副教授(北京100088)。本文系国家社科基金一般项目“人工智能时代算法安全的刑法保障研究”(22BFX048)的阶段性成果,同时受中国政法大学青年教师学术创新团队支持计划资助。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-06-25