[1]石艳,余赛月.我国高等教育入学机会公平政策变迁——基于间断均衡理论[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(01):053-66.
　SHI Yan,YU Saiyue.Policy Changes in Equity of Opportunities for Admission to Higher Education in China: An Analysis Based on Punctuated Equilibrium Theory[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(01):053-66.
点击复制

我国高等教育入学机会公平政策变迁——基于间断均衡理论
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2024年01期
页码:
053-66
栏目:
教育学研究
出版日期:
2024-02-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Policy Changes in Equity of Opportunities for Admission to Higher Education in China: An Analysis Based on Punctuated Equilibrium Theory
作者:
石艳; 余赛月
Author(s):
SHI Yan;  YU Saiyue
关键词:
教育公平; 高等教育入学机会; 间断均衡理论; 政策变迁
Keywords:
educational equity;  opportunity for admission to higher education;  punctuated equilibrium theory;  policy changes
摘要:
基于间断均衡理论考察我国高等教育入学机会公平政策变迁历程，发现政策图景历经“重塑公平取向”“效益优先、兼顾公平”“‘质’‘量’并重”三个时期，变迁过程呈现长期均衡与短期间断相交替的特征。在政策演进中，社会主要矛盾变化、重大焦点事件推动、决策理念转变作为变迁动因驱动政策打破垄断而促使人们重新审视政策。政策图景与政策场域的互动形成政策变迁的两种机制，负反馈机制实现政策渐进均衡，正反馈机制促使政策间断革新。未来我国还需发挥复合政策范式的系统效应，政策图景达成公共善与个体善的结合，政策理念实现多元叠加，政策场域确保开放包容与主体协同互动。
Abstract:
Utilizing the punctuated equilibrium theory, this study examines the evolution of policies governing equity in higher education admission opportunities in China. The analysis reveals three distinct phases in the policy trajectory: “reshaping the orientation of equity”, “prioritizing efficiency while considering equity”, and “giving equal weight to both ‘quality’ and ‘quantity’”. The evolutionary process is characterized by a dynamic interplay between long-term equilibrium and short-term punctuations. Key drivers of policy change include shifts in societal contradictions, significant events, and evolving policy paradigms that challenge monopolies and prompt a reevaluation of policies. The interplay between policy images and venues gives rise to two mechanisms guiding policy changes: the negative feedback mechanism, fostering gradual policy equilibrium, and the positive feedback mechanism, propelling punctuated policy innovation. Looking ahead, China must leverage the systemic impact of a composite policy paradigm. This involves aligning policy images with a dual focus on public and individual benefits, ensuring that policy concepts embrace multiplicity, and establishing policy venues that uphold openness, inclusivity, and collaborative interactions among stakeholders.

相似文献/References:

[1]余秀兰.关注质量与结果：我国教育公平的新追求[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(01):029.
　YU Xiulan.Quality and Outcome Count: The New Pursuit of Education Equity inChina[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(01):029.
[2]汤美娟.从代言到行动：教育底层研究的跃迁——弗莱雷对话教学思想的方法论启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(02):051.
　TANG Meijuan.The Shift from Speaking on Others’ Behalf to Taking Action inStudies on Lower Class Education: Methodological Implications ofPaulo Freire’s Dialogic Teaching[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(01):051.
[3]马宇航.大众化再考察：高等教育女性化的起点与内在逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(06):049.
　MA Yuhang.Rethinking Mass Higher Education: Origin and Internal Logic forFeminization of Higher Education[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(01):049.
[4]蔡和,牛颖楠,罗良.新时代义务教育资源配置的水平测度与均衡演进[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2024,(01):036.
　CAI He,NIU Yingnan,LUO Liang.Assessment and Balanced Progression of Compulsory Education Resource Allocation in China’s New Era[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2024,(01):036.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
石艳，教育学博士，东北师范大学教育学部教授、博士生导师（长春130024）；余赛月，东北师范大学教育学部博士研究生（长春130024）。本文系国家社会科学基金教育学重大课题“新时代教育公平的国家战略、推进策略与社会支持研究”（VGA220002）的研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-02-25