[1]孙元涛.“未来学校”研究的共识、分歧与潜在风险[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(05):005-14.
　SUN Yuantao.Studies on “Schools of Future”: Consensus, Controversies and Potential Risks[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(05):005-14.
点击复制

“未来学校”研究的共识、分歧与潜在风险

分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Title:: Studies on “Schools of Future”: Consensus, Controversies and Potential Risks

Keywords:: future schools; consensus; controversies; potential risks; technological determinism

摘要:: “未来学校”研究既蕴含着对当今学校诸多问题的反思与批判，也表达了对更美善的教育理想和学校样态的主动谋划。空间再造、技术赋能和个性化取向是“未来学校”研究形成的基本共识。但是，围绕如何面对未来的不确定性、是走向“去学科”还是走向以学科逻辑为根基的学科重构、是推动“教”的退隐还是在转型意义上进一步强化“教”的力量等问题，“未来学校”研究还存在诸多分歧。为引导更理性的未来学校建设，“未来学校”研究应谨防陷入“技术决定论”“无差别变革”和个人主义窠臼。

Abstract:: The research on “schools of future” not only contains the reflection on and the criticism of many problems in today's schools, but also shows a proactive planning for a better educational ideal and school pattern for the future. In this area, a consensus has been formed concerning the space reconstruction, technological empowerment, and personalized orientation of the development of future schools. However, there are still many controversies over such issues as how to face the uncertainty of the future, whether to move toward “de-discipline” or to reconstruct the disciplines based on the disciplinary logic, and whether to promote the retreat of “teaching” or to further strengthen the power of “teaching” in the sense of transformation. In order to guide the construction of future schools in a more rational way, the research on “schools of future” should avoid falling into such traps as “technological determinism”, “undifferentiated reform”, and social atomization.

备注/Memo:: 孙元涛，教育学博士，浙江大学教育学院教授、博士生导师（杭州310058）。
本文系全国教育科学规划重大攻关项目“未来学校组织形态与制度重构的理论与实践研究”（VFA210006）的阶段性成果。
SUN Yuantao, PhD in Education, is Professor and PhD Supervisor of College of Education, Zhejiang University（Hangzhou 310058).

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-10-25