[1]刘 峰.特殊个体的原理价值及其局限性——论泽柳政太郎的亚洲主义思想[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(01):143-151.
　LIU Feng.On the Pan-Asianism of Masataro Sawayanagi: A Critical Review[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(01):143-151.
点击复制

特殊个体的原理价值及其局限性——论泽柳政太郎的亚洲主义思想
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2022年01期
页码:
143-151
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Pan-Asianism of Masataro Sawayanagi: A Critical Review
作者:
刘 峰
Author(s):
LIU Feng
关键词:
日本;  亚洲主义;  泽柳政太郎;  世界主义
Keywords:
Japan;  Asianism;  Masataro Sawayanagi;  cosmopolitanism
摘要:
一战以后,近代日本的亚洲主义者在面对中国汹涌澎湃的反日浪潮时内心是极度失落的,以致于在此后开始对其思想理论展开重大调整。虽然其主流在于将国家改造运动与亚洲主义捆绑起来,但其中亦不乏别样的论调。而正是这些论调,展现出了与众不同的特殊原理性。尤其是泽柳政太郎,曾脱逸出以往“东方vs西方”的思维范式而将亚洲主义定义为足以与欧美并存共生的跨国境、超民族理念,以便将其作为通往世界主义的桥梁与当时盛行的“国联构想”进行融合。然而从其理论中所包含的日本盟主论等色彩来看,泽柳亦终究无法克服历史的局限性、无法跨越出扩张主义意识形态的范畴,未能将发展亚洲、世界大同作为目的,其本质仍停留在鼓吹日本利益优先的“亚洲门罗主义”层次而应予以批判。
Abstract:
After the First World War, the Asianists in modern Japan were extremely disappointed in the face of the surging anti-Japanese wave in China, so that they began to make major adjustments to their thoughts and theories. Although the mainstream lied in tying up the national transformation movement with Asianism, there was no lack of other arguments that showed a unique and special principle. Of particular notice is Masataro Sawayanagi who once broke away from the previous thinking paradigm of “Eastern vs. West” and defined Asianism as a transnational and super-national idea that a unified Asia could coexist with Europe and the United States. In other words, he tried to describe Asianism as a kind of medium for cosmopolitanism so as to let it integrate into the prevailing vision of the League of Nations at that time. However, in terms of the Japanese hegemony theory contained in his theory, Sawayanagi was also unable to overcome his limitations, failing to transcend the category of expansionist ideology and take the development of Asia and the whole world as a goal. In essence, it was still confined to the level of “Asian Monroe Doctrine” that advocated the priority of Japanese interests and should thus be criticized.

相似文献/References:

[1]池建新*.论高等教育普及化语境中教育机会公平的保障——以日本为借鉴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(03):088.
　CHI Jian-xin.How to Ensure Equal Opportunity in a Society with Mass HigherEducation：Taking Japan as an Example[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):088.
[2]柯劲松*.战后日本的历史观——七十年间教科书中的侵华战争记述之变迁[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(06):066.
　KE Jing-song.View on History in Post-War Japan：Changes in the TextbooksConcerning the War Narratives of Japanese Invasion of China[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(01):066.
[3]高晓霞*.日本校园欺凌的社会问题化：成因、治理及其启示[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):100.
　GAO Xiao-xia.School Bullying as a Social Problem in Japan：Causes，Governanceand Reflection[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(01):100.
[4]王海远*.日本20 世纪50 —80 年代的《楚辞》研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(05):117.
　WANG Hai-yuan.Studies on Chu Ci in Japan from 1950s to 1980s[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(01):117.
[5]胡建华.日本高等职业教育新发展:创设职业大学制度[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(04):025.
　HU Jianhua.A New Development of Higher Vocational Education in Japan: The Establishment of Vocational University System[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(01):025.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
刘峰,文学博士,上海师范大学外国语学院日语系、人文学院世界史系副教授,上海市“世界文学多样性与文明互鉴”创新团队成员(上海200234)。本文是国家社会科学基金重大项目“20世纪的历史学和历史学家”(19ZDA235)与国家社会科学基金重大项目“近代以来二战结束期间日本涉华宣传史料整理与研究”(20&ZD237)的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01