[1]曹孟勤*.论马克思主义人学视域中生态文明建设主体自身的文明[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):067.
　CAO Meng-qin.Civilizing the Constructor of Ecological Civilization:From the Perspective of Marx’s Concept of Man[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):067.
点击复制

论马克思主义人学视域中生态文明建设主体自身的文明
分享到：

《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
067
栏目:
哲学研究：生态文明建设研究
出版日期:
2016-02-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
Civilizing the Constructor of Ecological Civilization:From the Perspective of Marx’s Concept of Man
作者:
曹孟勤*
南京师范大学公共管理学院，210023
Author(s):
CAO Meng-qin
关键词:
生态文明; 主体文明; 马克思主义人学; 人化自然
Keywords:
ecological civilization;  civilization of the subject;  Marx’s concept of man;  humanized nature
摘要:
生态文明建设的根本路径是主体自身的文明，唯有实现主体自身的文明，才能通过主体的实践活动对象化出文明的现实。现实的文明不过是主体自身文明的实存形态。主体自身的文明是将大自然本身运行的生态法则内化为自我意识，完成与自然界的本质统一。主体自身的文明最终落实于改造自然界的实践活动上，通过实践活动才能实现自然的人化和人的自然化。不同的主体文明要求有不同的实践形态，与生态文明建设主体文明相一致的实践活动是人与自然之间物质变换的活动。
Abstract:
The fundamental approach to ecological civilization lies in the civilization of the subject, i.e. the constructor of the ecological civilization. Only through civilizing the subject himself can the objective ecological civilization be achieved via the practice of the subject, for the objective civilization is the concrete realization of the subjective civilization. The civilization of the subject can be achieved through internalizing the ecological mechanism of nature into his self consciousness, thus achieving an essential unity between man and nature. The civilization of the subject will eventually rest on his practice to transform nature; only through the practice can the humanization of nature and the naturalization of man be both achieved. Different civilizations of the subject require different types of practice; the practice in line with the civilization of the subject of ecological civilization is the activities to exchange the material between man and nature.

相似文献/References:

[1]何佩佩 邹 雄.论生态文明视野下环境利益的法律保障[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):065.
　HE Pei-pei,ZOU Xiong.Legal Protection of Environmental Benefits from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(01):065.
[2]宋宇文*.论生态文明建设中环境利益的类型与法律保护机制——基于庞德利益理论的视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):074.
　SONG Yu-wen.Types of Environmental Interests and Legal Protection Mechanism inEcological Civilization Construction: From the Perspective ofPound’s Theory of Interests[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):074.
[3]刘 魁 张苏强.有机马克思主义“中国引领论”的哲学反思[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):005.
　LIU Kui,ZHANG Su-qiang.Organic Marxism and Its Proposal of“ China’s Leadership” inBuilding Ecological Civilization：A Philosophical Critique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):005.
[4]邵从清.辩证法视域下中国生态文明的国际话语建构[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):012.
　SHAO Cong-qing.Building a Discourse on Chinese Ecological Civilization for the GlobalAudience：A Proposal from the Perspective of Dialectics[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(01):012.
[5]董前程.中国特色社会主义生态文明理论的伦理意蕴[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(06):083.
　DONG Qiancheng.Ethical Implications of the Theory of Socialist Ecological Civilizationwith Chinese Characteristics[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(01):083.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*哲学博士，南京师范大学公共管理学院教授、博士生导师，210023。本文是江苏省社科基金重点项目（14ZXA001）、南京师范大学马克思主义生态文明理论与江苏省生态文明实践协同创新中心项目的研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-02-02