[1]刘 魁 张苏强.有机马克思主义“中国引领论”的哲学反思[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):005.
 LIU Kui,ZHANG Su-qiang.Organic Marxism and Its Proposal of“ China’s Leadership” inBuilding Ecological Civilization:A Philosophical Critique[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(05):005.
点击复制

有机马克思主义“中国引领论”的哲学反思
分享到:

《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
005
栏目:
【马克思主义与当代世界】
出版日期:
2016-10-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Organic Marxism and Its Proposal of“ China’s Leadership” inBuilding Ecological Civilization:A Philosophical Critique
作者:
刘 魁 张苏强*
东南大学,210016
Author(s):
LIU KuiZHANG Su-qiang
关键词:
有机马克思主义生态文明中国引领全球责任
Keywords:
organic Marxismecological civilizationChina’s leadershipglobal responsibility
摘要:
鉴于当代严峻的生态危机,近年来以小约翰·B·柯布、菲利普·克莱顿等为代表的有机马克思主义者提出了生态文明发展的“中国引领论”,强调中国最有希望引领生态文明,中国应当担此拯救人类文明的全球责任。可是,作为一个发展中国家,中国自身环境问题突出,经济发展任务也很重,所以国际社会对其可行性表示质疑。实际上,“中国引领论”固然存在种种不足,但其核心主张仍然可以成立,因为这对中国来说既是一种不可推卸的国际责任,也是中国崛起的一个难得机遇,不可错过。我们需要做的是进一步对其内涵、理论缺陷及其可行性与实施策略等进行辨析与论证,为提升中国的引领能力服务。
Abstract:
Facing serious ecological crises,organic Marxists like John B. Cobb,Jr. and Philip Claytonproposed the notion of“ China’s leadership” in building ecological civilization. According to them,Chinais the most likely nation to take the leading role and should shoulder the responsibility for saving humancivilization globally. However,China is still a developing country facing serious environmental problems anddaunting economic tasks,so the feasibility of their proposal is questioned by the international community.Despite its deficiencies,the thrust of their theory is essentially correct. Playing a leading role in buildingecological civilization is not only the responsibility for the international community China should take but alsoan unparalleled opportunity for China to rise up as a big nation. What we need to do is to fully understand thetheory of“ China’s leadership”,plug up its theoretical holes,improve its feasibility and explore appropriatestrategies for its implementation so as to help promote China’s global influence.

相似文献/References:

[1]何佩佩 邹 雄.论生态文明视野下环境利益的法律保障[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(02):065.
 HE Pei-pei,ZOU Xiong.Legal Protection of Environmental Benefits from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(05):065.
[2]曹孟勤*.论马克思主义人学视域中生态文明建设主体自身的文明[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):067.
 CAO Meng-qin.Civilizing the Constructor of Ecological Civilization:From the Perspective of Marx’s Concept of Man[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(05):067.
[3]宋宇文*.论生态文明建设中环境利益的类型与法律保护机制——基于庞德利益理论的视角[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):074.
 SONG Yu-wen.Types of Environmental Interests and Legal Protection Mechanism inEcological Civilization Construction: From the Perspective ofPound’s Theory of Interests[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(05):074.
[4]邵从清.辩证法视域下中国生态文明的国际话语建构[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(05):012.
 SHAO Cong-qing.Building a Discourse on Chinese Ecological Civilization for the GlobalAudience:A Proposal from the Perspective of Dialectics[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(05):012.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 刘魁,哲学博士,东南大学江苏省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究基地教授,210016 ;张苏强,东南大学博士研究生,210016。本文是江苏省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究基地项目和东南大学基本科研业务费资助项目“中国特色社会主义基本原理研究”的研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-10-30