[1]萧盈盈.论德勒兹在《普鲁斯特和符号》中的美学悖论[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(06):150.
 XIAO Ying-ying.A Philosophical Adventure in Literature and Art:Deleuze’s Aesthetic Paradox in Proust and Signs[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(06):150.
点击复制

论德勒兹在《普鲁斯特和符号》中的美学悖论
分享到:

《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年06期
页码:
150
栏目:
美学研究
出版日期:
2015-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Philosophical Adventure in Literature and Art:Deleuze’s Aesthetic Paradox in Proust and Signs
作者:
萧盈盈*
南京师范大学文学院讲师,210097。
Author(s):
XIAO Ying-ying
关键词:
善良意志 真理 无意识 理智 感知
Keywords:
good will truth unconsciousness intellect perception
摘要:
哲学文艺化是肇始于形而上学内部危机的一场当代文哲联姻,也是当代西方(特别是法国)理论和创作的一个大趋势。然而当哲学离开逻辑去文艺里寻找经验时,却出现了不可调和的美学悖论。以德勒兹的《普鲁斯特和符号》为例,在这一文艺到哲学的旅途中,德勒兹将推动哲学的原动力默认为是文艺创作的原动力,从而出现了不可调和的美学悖论。《普鲁斯特和符号》一方面给出了哲学在文艺作品中建构的全新视角,另一方面又因为文艺和哲学的相异性与不可通约性,无法抵达德勒兹给出的结论。
Abstract:
The literary and artistic turn in philosophy is actually the marriage between literature, art and philosophy arising from the crisis of metaphysics. It is also the general trend of contemporary theory and creation in the West and especially in France. However, when philosophy departs from logic for literature and art for the sake of experience, how could the intrinsic differences between them be resolved? In his journey from literature and art to philosophy, Deleuze, as evidenced by his Proust and Signs, takes the original drive for philosophy as the primary force for literary and artistic creations by default, thus leading to an insuperable paradox in aesthetics. This is why, on the one hand, Proust and Signs gives a new philosophic perspective on literature and art and on the other, Deleuze cannot reach his goal because of the dissimilarities and incommensurability between philosophy and literature as well as art.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 文学博士,南京师范大学文学院讲师,210097。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-15