[1]王 波.实证的、解释的和批判的:心理学研究的三大传统[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2015,(05):103.
　WANG Bo.Positivistic, Hermeneutical and Critical: Three Traditions of Psychological Research[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2015,(05):103.
点击复制

实证的、解释的和批判的:心理学研究的三大传统
分享到：

《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2015年05期
页码:
103
栏目:
当代中国教育研究
出版日期:
2015-10-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
Positivistic, Hermeneutical and Critical: Three Traditions of Psychological Research
作者:
王 波*
南京大学社会学院,210023
Author(s):
WANG Bo
关键词:
实证;  解释;  批判;  心理学传统;  理论心理学;  心理学史
Keywords:
positivistic;  hermeneutical;  critical;  traditions of psychology;  theoretical psychology;  history of psychology
摘要:
厘定心理学的研究传统,对理论心理学和心理学史,乃至具体的心理学研究都具有重要意义。根据对采取何种立场才可以使人的“心理”“显现”出其特征性属性这一问题的回应,现有的心理学研究基本可以分成三种传统:实证的传统,它主要表现为心理学中客体向度的立场; 解释的传统,它主要表现为心理学中主体向度的立场; 批判的传统,它主要表现为从批判立场出发的对心理学的“可能认识的条件”,亦即对心理学学科构成的社会历史条件与先验可能的讨论。
Abstract:
It is of great significance for the theory and history of psychology and even specific psychological studies to develop a clear picture of the traditions of psychological research. According to the responses to the question as to what standpoint we can adopt to unveil the characteristic properties of human mind, the existing psychological research can be basically divided into three categories: positivistic tradition characterized by its taking an object standpoint; hermeneutical tradition by its taking a subject standpoint; and critical tradition by its focusing on the conditions of possible knowledge, namely the social-historical formation and a priori possibilities of the discipline of psychology.

相似文献/References:

[1]王 鉴 刘祎莹.试论课堂研究中的深描与解释方法[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2019,(06):025.
　WANG Jian,LIU Yiying.The Method of Thick Description and Interpretationin Classroom-based Researches[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2019,(05):025.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 哲学博士,南京大学社会学院讲师,210023。本文是2014年国家社会科学基金项目“国外马克思主义批判心理学思潮研究”(14CZX003)的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-09-15