[1]李国英.知识产权限制的理论依据辨析——“内在限制”还是“外在限制”抑或其他[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(05):061.
 LI Guo-ying.Theoretical Basis of Restrictions on Intellectual Property Rights:Internal or External Restrictions or Something Else?[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(05):061.
点击复制

知识产权限制的理论依据辨析——“内在限制”还是“外在限制”抑或其他
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
061
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical Basis of Restrictions on Intellectual Property Rights:Internal or External Restrictions or Something Else?
作者:
李国英*
南京师范大学法学院,210023。
Author(s):
LI Guo-ying
关键词:
知识产权限制 内在理论 外在理论 内部限制 外部限制
Keywords:
restrictions on intellectual property rights internal theory external theory internal restrictions external restrictions
摘要:
权利限制的理论依据,在法理层面上有“内在限制”与“外在限制”两大理论之争; 在规范层面上有“规范限制”与“原则限制”两大类别; 在学科层面上有“内部限制”与“外部限制”两大来源。基于知识产权强烈的法定性和知识产权法显著的个人与社会“双重本位”特征,“内在限制”应是知识产权限制的理论依据; “规范限制”是知识产权限制的主要方式; “内部限制”是知识产权限制的主要来源,但与理论依据无涉。
Abstract:
Over the theoretical basis of the restrictions on legal rights, there are various controversies: at the jurisprudential level, they are about whether the restrictions are internal or external to the rights; at the normative level, about whether they are normative or principled in nature; and at the disciplinary level, about whether they are from inside or outside sources. Given that the intellectual property rights are defined and established by law and both individually and socially-oriented, they should be regarded as intrinsic in terms of theoretical basis, normative in terms of manner of operation, and internal(but theoretically neutral)in terms of origin.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 法学博士,南京师范大学法学院副教授,210023。本文受“江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目”(PAPD)资助。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-10-05