[1]汪凤炎.关于自我的太极模型的三个问题[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023,(06):057-65.
 WANG Fengyan.On the Three Questions about the Taiji Model of Self[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2023,(06):057-65.
点击复制

关于自我的太极模型的三个问题
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2023年06期
页码:
057-65
栏目:
心理学研究
出版日期:
2023-12-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Three Questions about the Taiji Model of Self
作者:
汪凤炎
Author(s):
WANG Fengyan
关键词:
自我的太极模型 高度心理学 抽象继承法 深层结构 表层结构
Keywords:
Taiji model of self advanced psychology abstract inheritance deep structure surface structure
摘要:
正由于阴与阳可以表征宇宙万物中任何一对相反相成的概念,它才能作为自我太极模型的根逻辑,构成自我太极模型的深层结构。不过,阴阳思维落实到自我的太极图模型中的子模型中,已换成一对对纯粹的心理学术语,自然可建构出吻合儒、道、佛等诸家的自我太极模型的子类型。自我的太极模型至少有三个优势,从而能统合现有几种有代表性的中式自我理论。为了提升自我太极模型的科学性,未来实证研究方向主要有三:一是编制出信效度良好的《自我的太极模型量表》; 二是以自我的太极模型为理论依据,至少可开展行为实验、质性研究和干预研究等三类实证研究; 三是自我的太极模型内蕴含高度心理学,可用来有效指导道德教育、心理健康教育和社会治理等。
Abstract:
It is precisely because Yin and Yang can represent any pair of opposing and complementary concepts in the universe that they serve as the root logic for the Taiji Model of Self, forming its underlying structure. However, when applied to the sub-models of the Taiji Model of Self, Yin-Yang thinking has been adapted to a pair of purely psychological terms. Consequently, this adaption allows for the construction of various subtypes of the Taiji Model of Self that align with Confucianism, Daoism, Buddhism, and other strands of philosophical theories. The Taiji Model of Self has at least three advantages, allowing it to accommodate several representative Chinese self-theories. To enhance the scientific rigor of the Taiji Model of Self, future empirical research should focus on the following three main directions: firstly, to develop a well-validated “Taiji Model of Self Scale”; secondly, to utilize the Taiji Model of Self as the theoretical basis for conducting three such types of empirical research as behavioral experiments, qualitative studies, and intervention studies; thirdly, to recognize the profound psychological implications within the Taiji Model of Self, which can serve as a guide for various applied research areas, including self-cultivation(moral education), psychological well-being education, and social governance.

参考文献/References:

诺伊曼(Erich Neumann),1998:《深度心理学与新道德》,高宪田、黄水乞译,北京:东方出版社。
费孝通,1989:《中华民族的多元一体格局》,《北京大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)第4期。
费孝通,1998:《乡土中国》,北京:北京大学出版社。
冯友兰,1957a:《中国哲学遗产底继承问题》,《光明日报》1957年1月8日。
冯友兰,1957b:《再论中国哲学遗产底继承问题》,《哲学研究》第5期。
韩诚、张俊龙、郭蕾等,2017:《气一元论及其对中医学的影响》,《中医杂志》第20期。
黄光国,2006:《社会科学的理路》,北京:中国人民大学出版社。
黄光国,2012:《跳脱“二元对立”的思维框架》,《本土心理学研究》第37期。
李平,2014:《中国智慧哲学与中庸之道研究》,杨宜音主编:《中国社会心理学评论》(第8辑),北京:社会科学文献出版社。
陆洛,2003:《人我关系之界定——“折衷自我”的现身》,《本土心理学研究》第20期。
陆洛,2007:《个人取向与社会取向的自我观:概念分析与实征测量》,《美国教育评论》第2期。
庞朴,1993:《对立与三分》,《中国社会科学》1993年第2期。
汪凤炎,2004:《古代中国人心中的“我”及其启示》,《心理科学》第2期。
汪凤炎,2018:《对水稻理论的质疑:兼新论中国人偏好整体思维的内外因》,《心理学报》第5期。
汪凤炎,2019a:《独立自我和互依自我:从文化历史演化看中式自我的诞生、转型与定格》,《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)第4期。
汪凤炎,2019b:《中国文化心理学新论》(上),上海:上海教育出版社。
汪凤炎,2019c:《中国文化心理学新论》(下),上海:上海教育出版社。
汪凤炎,2022:《自我的太极模型:提出背景与核心观点》,《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)第2期。
杨国枢,2004:《华人自我的理论分析与实证研究:社会取向与个人取向的观点》,《本土心理学研究》第22期。
杨国枢、陆洛,2009:《中国人的自我:心理学的分析》,重庆:重庆大学出版社。
杨中芳,2001:《如何理解中国人-文化与个人论文集》,台北:远流出版公司。
徐进、林俊德、张灵聪、夏允中,2019:《建构以〈易经〉为基础的内在朝向式多层立体曼陀罗模型:“天人合一”我理论》,《本土心理学研究》2019年总第51卷。
Anagarika,L.G.,1981,The Inner Structure of the I Ching:The Book of Transformations,New York:Wheelwright Press.
Erikson,E.H.,1959,Identity and the Life Cycle,New York:International Universities Press.
Fiske,A.P.,2002,“Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures—A critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs:Comment on Oyserman et al.(2002)”,Psychological Bulletin, Vol.128,No.1,pp.78-88.
Freud,S.,1923,The Ego and the Id,London:Hogarth Press.
Hong,Y.Y.,2009,“A dynamic constructivist approach to culture:Moving from describing culture to explaining culture”,in R.S.Wyer,C.Y.Chiu & Y.Y.Hong(eds.),Problems and Solutions in Cross-cultural Theory,Research and Application,New York:Psychology Press,pp.3-24.
Hong,Y.Y.,M.W.Morris & C.Y.Chiu,et al.,2000,“Multicultural minds:A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition”,American Psychologist,Vol.55,No.7,pp.709-720.
Hwang,K.K.,2011,“The mandala model of self”,Psychological Studies,Vol.56,No.4,pp.329-334.
Hwang,K.K.,2019,“A psychodynamic model of self-nature”,Counselling Psychology Quarterly,Vol.32,pp.285-306.
Kitayama,S.& H.R.Markus,1999,“The yin and yang of the Japanese self:The cultural psychology of personality coherence”,in D.Cervone & Y.Shoda(eds.),The Coherence of Personality:Social Cognitive Bases of Personality Consistency,Variability,and Organization,New York:Guilford,pp.242-302.
Liu,F.,2004,“Toward excitation and inhibition in neutrosophic logic:A multiagent model based on ying-yang philosophy”,Smarandache Notions Journal,Vol.14,No.1,pp.381-388.
Liu,S.H.,J.P.Hung & H.I.Peng,et al.,2016,“Virtue existential career model:A dialectic and integrative approach echoing eastern philosophy”,Frontiers in Psychology,Vol.7,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01761.
Markus,H.R.& S.Kitayama,1991,“Culture and the self:Implications for cognition,emotion,and motivation”,Psychological Review,Vol.98,No.2,pp.224-253.
Markus,H.R.& S.Kitayama,1994,“A collective fear of the collective:Implication for selves and the theory of selves”,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,Vol.20,pp.569-579.
Markus,H.R.& S.Kitayama,2010,“Cultures and selves:A cycle of mutual constitution”,Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol.5,No.4,pp.420-430.
Peng,K.& R.E.Nisbett,1999,“Culture,dialectics,and reasoning about contradiction”,American Psychologist, Vol.54,pp.741-754.
Rosch,E.,1975,“Cognitive representations of semantic categories”,Journal of Experimental Psychology:General,Vol.104,No.3,pp.192-233.
Spencer-Rodgers,J.,H.C.Boucher & S.U.Mori,et al.,2009,“The dialectical self-concept:Contradiction,change,and holism in East Asian cultures”,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,Vol.35,No.1,pp.29-44.
Wang,F.Y.,2023,“The Taiji model of the self:Proposition background and core points”,Cultura & Psyché:Journal of Cultural Psychology,https://doi.org/10.1007/s43638-023-00069-z.
Wang,F.Y.,Z.D.Wang & R.J.Wang,2019,“The Taiji model of self”,Frontiers in Psychology,Vol.10,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01443.
Wang,K.,2021,“The ‘One Mind,Two Aspects' model of the self:The self model and self-cultivation theory of Chinese Buddhism”, Frontiers in Psychology,Vol.12,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652465.
Wang,Z.D.& F.Y.Wang,2020,“The Taiji model of self II:Developing self models and self-cultivation theories based on the Chinese cultural traditions of Taoism and Buddhism”, Frontiers in Psychology,Vol.11,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.540074.
Wang,Z.D.& F.Y.Wang,2021,“Ternary Taiji models of the traditional Chinese self:Centered on Confucian,Taoist,and Buddhist cultures”,Journal of Humanistic Psychology,Vol.13,doi:10.1177/00221678211016957.
Wang,Z.D.,Y.L.Wang & Q.Zhang,et al.,2022,“Influence of Confucianism and Taoism on self-construal and thinking style:An intervention study”,The Journal of Social Psychology,https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2022.2140642.
Xu,J.,N.S.Chang & Y.F.Hsu,et al.,2022,“Comments on previous psychological Tai-Chi models:Jun-zi self-cultivation model”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 13,doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.871274.
Yang,C.F.,2006,“The Chinese conception of the self:Towards a person-making(做人)perspective”,in U.Kim,K.S.Yang & K.K.Hwang(eds.),Indigenous and Cultural Psychology:Understanding People in Context,New York:Springer,pp.327-356.

相似文献/References:

[1]汪凤炎.自我的太极模型:提出背景与核心观点[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2022,(02):053.
 WANG Fengyan.The Taiji Model of Self: Proposition Background and Core Points[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2022,(06):053.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
汪凤炎,心理学博士,南京师范大学心理学院教授、博士生导师,教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地南京师范大学道德教育研究所研究员(南京210097)。本文是国家自然科学基金(31971014)和江苏省第五期“333高层次人才培养工程”科研资助项目“文化对个体智慧表现的影响及机制”的阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2023-12-25