«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

期数:

2022年06期

页码:

115-124

栏目:

法学研究

出版日期:

2022-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Building Independent Procedures for the Plea Leniency System

作者:

孙道萃

Author(s):

SUN Daocui

关键词:

认罪认罚从宽诉讼程序;  独立化;  理论证成;  基本构成

Keywords:

procedure of plea leniency system;  independence;  theoretical confirmation;  basic elements

摘要:

认识论偏颇、制度配套迟滞、刑事司法环境支持不足等原因，导致我国认罪认罚从宽诉讼程序欠缺独立性，这集中表现为诉讼程序的嵌入式适用而非独立化适用、审前主导虚化与庭审中心乏能的双重背反、诉讼类型笼统整合而非精细区分的撕裂效应、单一简化而非实质简约的程序正当困境等，最终导致认罪认罚从宽制度缺乏程序衔接与措施落地的充足保障。认罪认罚从宽诉讼程序的独立是客观需要，重点在于解决好两类案件分流与独立诉讼程序的二元分立、简化审程序的繁简有度及其内部协同、诉讼阶段的审前主导与审判中心之有序侧重、定罪与量刑分离下的“二元”程序和“单一”程序之取舍、重罪轻罪差序下重罪与轻罪诉讼程序之优化等主要议题。针对认罪认罚案件，应奉行一元化的整体程序独立模式，与不认罪认罚案件诉讼程序相互并存，此外还需明确独立的认罪认罚从宽诉讼程序之基本组成要素与功能规则。

Abstract:

Factors such as the epistemological bias, delayed institutional support, and insufficient support from the criminal justice environment have given rise to a lack of independence in the litigation procedures of plea leniency system. The major problems that this lack of independence has caused include: the “embedded” rather than “independent” application of the procedures; the double contradictions caused by the weakening of the “pre-trial leading” and the inability of the principle of “trial centeredness”; the negative effect of the “general” integration rather than “refined” differentiation of litigation; and the dilemma due to the “simplification” rather than “optimization” of procedural legitimacy. All this calls for the independence of the procedures involving the plea leniency system. In order to achieve this goal, it is necessary to resolve such issues as the diversion of case types and two independent litigation procedures; the simplification of the complexity of the trial procedures; the coordination between the pre-trial guidance and the observance of the principle of trial centeredness during the litigation process; the choice of conviction and sentencing under the “dual” procedure or “single procedure”; and the separation of the felony procedure and the misdemeanor procedure under the differential order of felony and misdemeanor. It is necessary to further clarify the elements of the leniency procedure for confirming guilt and punishment, and optimize the supporting measures.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

孙道萃,法学博士,中国政法大学国家法律援助研究院副教授(北京100088)。本文系研究阐释党的十九届四中全会精神国家社科基金重大项目“健全社会公平正义法治保障制度研究”(20ZDA032)、中国政法大学青年教师资助计划“检察机关贯彻落实认罪认罚从宽制度的实证研究”(1000-10820706)的阶段性成果。
SUN Daocui, PhD in Law, is Associate Professor at the College of National Legal Aid, China University of Political Science and Law(Beijing 100088).

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-25