康德自然目的概念的认识论批判——兼及第一批判到第三批判的隐性过渡-《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: An Epistemological Critique of Kant’s Concept of Natural Purposes:Focusing on the Transition from the First Critique to the ThirdCritique

Keywords:: teleology; architectonic; judgment; natural purposes; purposiveness of nature

摘要:: 目的论思想从其发轫伊始，就在西方哲学传统中肩负着重要的认识论功能，却在近代思想中颓然式微。而康德以其批判哲学的理路捍卫和重塑了目的论的全新形象，并为其认识论意蕴预留了地盘，凸显了二者的辩证张力。从自然目的理念在《纯粹理性批判》中的提出，到“纯粹理性的建筑术”之构想，以致隐秘地过渡到《判断力批判》的自然合目的性和自然目的概念，显露出康德目的论批判的完整运思道路。康德正是沿着第一批判开辟的道路，以“先天综合判断”为隐性纲领，在第三批判中引入“自然的技艺”来充当反思判断力的类比原理——取代“图型论”，以完成自然合目的性的“客观化”演绎，即目的论证明。据此，康德一方面批判地裁制了自然目的概念的认识论价值，另一方面也演示了理性与知性协同运作于自然目的概念中的判断力机能。

Abstract:: Teleology has played an important epistemological role in the western philosophical traditionsince its inception, but its importance declined in modern thought. Kant, with his critical philosophy,defended the importance of teleology and reconstructed a new image for it, reserving a place for itsepistemological implication and highlighting the dialectical tension between his critical philosophy andteleology. The complete thinking path of Kant’s critique of teleology can be found in his wide range oftheorizations from the idea of natural purposes put forward in his Critique of Pure Reason to the compositionof his“ Architecture of Pure Reason”, which ultimately leads to a covert transition to purposivenessof nature and natural purposes in his Critique of Judgment. Kant, following the guidance of syntheticaljudgments a priori along the road paved by the first critique, introduced“ technic of nature” into the thirdcritique to act as the analogical principle of reflective judgment, replacing the“ theory of schema” to completethe“ objective” deduction of the purposiveness of nature. In so doing, Kant, on the one hand, criticized theepistemological value of natural teleology; he, on the other hand, demonstrated how reason and understandingwork harmoniously in the concept of natural purpose under the function of judgment.