[1]姜涛*.国家监察法与刑事诉讼法衔接的重大问题研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(06):097.
　JIANG Tao.Major Issues in the Convergence of the Supervision Law andCriminal Procedure Law[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(06):097.
点击复制

国家监察法与刑事诉讼法衔接的重大问题研究

分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Title:: Major Issues in the Convergence of the Supervision Law andCriminal Procedure Law

Keywords:: China’s supervision law; trial-centeredness doctrine; authority for detention; duty crimes; dutyviolations

摘要:: 就职务犯罪的调查、追诉与审判而言，国家监察法与刑事诉讼法如铁路警察般“各管一段”，两法之间的衔接至为重要。这种衔接在法理上并无矛盾，国家监察法与刑事诉讼法都属于宪法之下的基本法律，具有相同的法律地位与法律效力。两者的衔接具有实体标准与程序建构两个维度，前者要求明确职务违法与职务犯罪的边界，不能以政务处分代替刑事追究，后者则涉及如何对接审判中心主义、刑事诉讼上的证明标准、实施非法证据排除等，并需要实现逮捕与留置措施的对接。

Abstract:: As far as the investigation, prosecution and trial of duty crimes are concerned, the connectionbetween the state supervision law and the criminal procedure law is very important. This connection is notcontradictory in the legal principle, for the supervision law and the criminal procedure law both belong to thecategory of basic laws under the Constitution and have the same legal status and legal effect. The connectionbetween the supervision law and the criminal procedure law has two dimensions: substantive standards andprocedural requirements. The former dimension requires a clear boundary between duty crimes and dutyviolations, and criminal investigation cannot be replaced by administrative sanctions; the latter involves howto accommodate such issues as the trial-centeredness doctrine, proof standards in criminal proceedings, and theimplementation of illegal evidence exclusion, and in particular how to bridge the gap between arrests and otherdetention measures.

备注/Memo:: *法学博士，南京师范大学法学院教授、博士生导师，国家“2011 计划”·司法文明协同创新中心、江苏高校区域法治协同创新中心、中国法治现代化研究院、江苏省教育厅校外研究基地司法现代化研究中心兼职研究员，210023。本文系研究阐释党的十九大精神国家社科基金专项课题“推进反腐败国家立法研究”（18VSJ103）、国家社会科学基金重点项目“刑法体系的合宪性控制研究”（17AFX018）的阶段性研究成果。

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-25