[1]孟宪平*.马克思主义视域中的文化符号与话语体系同构分析[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(06):075.
　MENG Xian-ping.Analyzing the Isomorphism between Cultural Symbols and DiscourseSystem from the Perspective of Marxism[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(06):075.
点击复制

马克思主义视域中的文化符号与话语体系同构分析
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
075
栏目:
马克思主义研究
出版日期:
2018-11-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analyzing the Isomorphism between Cultural Symbols and DiscourseSystem from the Perspective of Marxism
作者:
孟宪平*
南京师范大学公共管理学院，江苏省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心，210023
Author(s):
MENG Xian-ping
关键词:
马克思主义; 文化符号; 话语体系; 同构
Keywords:
Marxism;  cultural symbols;  discourse system;  isomorphism
摘要:
文化符号提供了认识时空的不同方式和表达问题的工具，由社会实践提供的新的叙事策略，给文化符号发展注入了新动力。文化符号与话语体系都有自身的建构逻辑，其理想状态是形式上同构、表达上连贯、意义上契合。二者的同构要素包括主客体关系、价值寄托方式以及链接形式，其原初意义、指称意义、象征意义和引领意义经常随语境和环境而变化，构建文化符号和话语体系要立足于思想高度、全景高度、生活实践高度，通过融合创新来实现。马克思主义语境中的文化符号与话语体系建构，是以中国特色社会主义理论与实践为基础展开的，文化软实力、文化自信、社会主义文化强国等，都有特定的符号价值和话语指向。
Abstract:
Cultural symbols provide different ways of understanding space and time and a tool for formulatingquestions. New narrative strategies provided by social practice inject new impetus into the development ofcultural symbols. Cultural symbols and discourse system have their own logic of construction, the ideal stateof which is that one is isomorphic with the other in form, coherent in expression and consistent in meaning. Tobe specific, they are isomorphic with each other in such aspects as the relationship between the subject and theobject, inner values and the way of making signification. Their original meaning, referential meaning, symbolicmeaning and guiding function often vary with the context and environment. The construction of culturalsymbols and discourse system should be guided by advanced thoughts, conducted from a comprehensiveperspective, based on life practice, and realized by integration and innovation. The construction of culturalsymbols and discourse system in the Marxist context is based on the theory and practice of the socialism withChinese characteristics. That is to say, such notions as“ cultural soft power” ,“ cultural self-confidence” and“socialist cultural power” all have specific symbolic value and discursive denotation.

相似文献/References:

[1]黄明理,杨成敏.抽象的人与人的抽象:马克思人性观与时俱进的创新——兼对以人为本理念虚化现象批判[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2012,(06):005.
[2]梅荣政*.正确认识和处理社会主义时期一定范围的阶级斗争[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(01):033.
　MEI RONG-zheng.Correctly Understanding and Handling ClassStruggle during Socialist Period[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(06):033.
[3]孟宪平.马克思主义视域中的文化边界及其守护分析[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(04):005.
　MENG Xian-ping.Cultural Boundary and Its Protection：An Analysis from thePerspective of Marxism[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(06):005.
[4]尹才祥*.马克思主义分工理论的思想精髓及其时代价值[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2016,(06):040.
　YIN Cai-xiang.Marxist Labor Division Theory：Its Essence andContemporary Implications[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2016,(06):040.
[5]蔡永生*.论当代中国鲜活的马克思主义的核心要义——习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(01):005.
　CAI Yong-sheng.On the Essence of the Living Marxism in Contemporary China：A Study of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with ChineseCharacteristics for a New Era[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(06):005.
[6]王南湜 黄亚明*.激荡于人类理想与现实运动之间的社会主义[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(01):027.
　WANG Nan-shi,HUANG Ya-ming.The Tension between Socialism as a Human Ideal and Socialismas a Practical Social Movement[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(06):027.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
*法学博士，南京师范大学公共管理学院教授、博士生导师，江苏省中国特色社会主义理论体系研究中心特聘研究员，210023。本文是国家哲学社会科学重大项目招标项目“习近平总书记意识形态系列重要讲话的理论贡献和实践要求研究”（15ZDA002）、国家社科基金项目“网上思想文化阵地的型构模式及建构方式研究”（16BKS118）、国家艺术基金2018 年度传播交流推广项目“江苏文艺评论平台建设”（2018-A03-( 180 )-0524）的研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-25