后马克思主义语境中的法律思想及其法理脉络-《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: Legal Thoughts and Jurisprudential Logic in the Context of Post-Marxism

Keywords:: Post-Marxism; law; jurisprudential logic; separation; dissolution; discourse

摘要:: 后马克思主义宣称他们的理论内在于马克思主义的谱系学之中，但是，不遗余力地撕裂经济基础与上层建筑的叙事方式，使得他们的理论与马克思主义的“阶级”、三个层面（经济、政治和意识形态）、生产力与生产关系之间的矛盾关系等理论其实无关，无可撼摇的法律理论根基与正当性基础荡然无存。由于后马克思主义撕裂并消解经济基础与上层建筑的关联，赋予法律“政治”本体论属性、把“话语”看成是“法律”生成的主要元素，同时认为“法律”是伴随人类永恒存在的社会事实等认知，严重腐蚀了马克思主义法律理论根基，后马克思主义对“法”的主张与马克思主义法律思想及其法理脉络相去甚远，偏离多于继承。

Abstract:: Post-Marxists claim that their theory is inherent in the genealogy of Marxism, but their way oftheoretical narration spares no effort to separate the economic base from the superstructure. This makes theirtheory have little bearing on Marx’s theory concerning such issues as the class, the three basic strata consistingof economy, politics and ideology, and the contradiction between productive forces and production relations,thus greatly undermining the foundation and legitimacy of the legal theory. The Post-Marxism has severed anddissolved the dialectical connection between the economic foundation and the superstructure, endowed law andpolitics with an ontological status, and regarded discourse as the main element for the generation of law. At thesame time, it also holds that law is a permanent social fact in every type of human society. All this has seriouslycorroded the foundation of the Marxist legal theory in that its legal ideas are alien to the Marxist legal thoughtsand jurisprudential logic. It deviates more than inherits from the Marxist legal theory.