[1]杨嵘均*.论国家治理现代化的公共性价值及其实践向度——惠鉴《公共性视野下的国家治理现代化》的历史与现实维度[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2018,(03):005.
 YANG Rong-jun.Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Publicness in ModernizingState Governance:A Review of Modernizing State Governance under theView of Publicness[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2018,(03):005.
点击复制

论国家治理现代化的公共性价值及其实践向度——惠鉴《公共性视野下的国家治理现代化》的历史与现实维度
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
005
栏目:
政治学理论与实践
出版日期:
2018-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Theoretical and Practical Dimensions of Publicness in ModernizingState Governance:A Review of Modernizing State Governance under theView of Publicness
作者:
杨嵘均*
南京师范大学马克思主义学院,210023
Author(s):
YANG Rong-jun
关键词:
公共性价值公平正义国家治理现代化合作型国家治理
Keywords:
value of publicnessfairness and justicemodernizing state governancecooperative stategovernance
摘要:
在我国,对于公共性价值旨趣的追寻,是当前治国理政的灵魂,也是实现国家治理现代化的理想愿景。它体现着国家施政、政党执政以及政府行政的德性。基于公共性价值实践的历史与现实双重维度的考察,在反思西方国家在治理现代化过程中落入“形式公共性”窠臼的深层根源基础上,可以逻辑地得出这一结论:将“形式公共性”和“实质公共性”融合一体的公共性价值追寻,必然是现代化的国家治理价值与国家治理模式之间的逻辑联系及其实践规律的客观要求。因此,理论上而言,这对于明晰国家治理价值未来演进的社会机理以及推动我国国家治理体系与治理能力现代化发展的进程,并进而探寻在“形式公共性”和“实质公共性”整合基础上总结与提升我国治理现代化的“中国方案”,具有重要的理论价值与实践意义。
Abstract:
Currently,the pursuit of publicness constitutes the essence of the governance of China as wellas the prospect of its modernization of governance. Publicness,as a matter of fact,embodies the virtuesrequired by the activities of the state,the ruling party and the government. Through examining the valuepractice of publicness both diachronically and synchronically,we made a critical review of the root cause forthe trap of so-called formal publicness into which the western countries have fallen during the modernizationof their state governance. A logical conclusion of our examination and review is that the integration betweenformal publicness and substantial publicness is required by the logic between the value pursuit of modernstate governance and the mode of state governance and by the principle governing the practice in this regard.Therefore,this integration is of great theoretical and practical significance for identifying the social mechanismof the future evolution of the value of state governance;for promoting the modernization of China’s systemand capacity for state governance;and then for proposing a Chinese approach to the modernization of stategovernance on the basis of exploring the ways of integrating formal publicness and substantial publicness.

相似文献/References:

[1]君博 杨凯杨凯*.中国网络公共事件的议程互动模式 ———基于社会公平正义相关事件的经验研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2013,(05):013.
 YU Jun bo,YANG Kai.The Interactive Policy Agendasetting Model in Chinas Internet Incidents: An Empirical Study on Events Concerning Social Justice[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2013,(03):013.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 法学博士,南京师范大学马克思主义学院研究员、博士生导师,210023。本文是国家社科基金重点项目“网络虚拟社群对国家政治安全的影响及政府协同治理研究”(14AZZ016)阶段性成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-25