[1]李曙光*.乔姆斯基“儿童即语言学家”命题的实质与作用[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2017,(04):109.
LI Shu-guang.Chomsky’s Analogical Thesis of“ Children Are Linguists”:Its Essence and Significance[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2017,(04):109.
点击复制
乔姆斯基“儿童即语言学家”命题的实质与作用
《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]
- 卷:
-
- 期数:
-
2017年04期
- 页码:
-
109
- 栏目:
-
心理学理论与应用研究
- 出版日期:
-
2017-08-30
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Chomsky’s Analogical Thesis of“ Children Are Linguists”:Its Essence and Significance
- 作者:
-
李曙光*
-
南京师范大学外国语学院教授,210097
- Author(s):
-
LI Shu-guang
-
-
- 关键词:
-
语言习得; 语言理论; 刺激贫乏; 心智主义; 认知革命
- Keywords:
-
language acquisition; linguistic theory; poverty of stimulus; mentalism; cognitive revolution
- 摘要:
-
“儿童即语言学家”是乔姆斯基语言心理学理论中的一个核心命题。该命题包括两个方面:本体论上,儿童是构建语法的“语言学家”;方法论上,语言学家则应该是“学语的儿童”。理性主义内在论是该类比命题的逻辑起点,刺激贫乏是其经验支持,心智主义在心理学中的复兴则是其理论后果。该命题的提出,给行为主义予以沉重打击,为第一次认知革命的形成提供了有力的助推,确立了语言在心理学及整个认知科学中的关键地位。
- Abstract:
-
The analogy of“ children are linguists”is a key thesis in Chomsky’s theory of language andpsychology. There are two dimensions in this thesis:ontologically,children are regarded as the linguists whocan construct a theory of grammar;methodologically,linguists should work as the children who are acquiringtheir mother tongue. The innateness hypothesis of rationalism constitutes the logical basis of this analogicalthesis;the argument of poverty of stimulus can supply it with strong empirical support;and the revival ofmentalism in psychology can be regarded as one of its theoretical consequences. After its inception,this thesisgave behaviorism a fatal blow and the first cognitive revolution a great boost,thus securing for language a keyposition in cognitive sciences as well as in psychology.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
* 文学博士,南京师范大学外国语学院教授,210097。本文是“江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目”研究成果(优势学科代码:20140901)。
更新日期/Last Update:
2017-08-30