[1]张廷干.“德—道”与“自然—自由”:庄子心性秩序理论的形上建构[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2014,(05):015.
 ZHANG Ting-gan.“Te-Tao” and “Nature-Freedom”:Metaphysical Construction of Chuang-tzu’s Theory of Mind Order[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2014,(05):015.
点击复制

“德—道”与“自然—自由”:庄子心性秩序理论的形上建构
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2014年05期
页码:
015
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-10-05

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Te-Tao” and “Nature-Freedom”:Metaphysical Construction of Chuang-tzu’s Theory of Mind Order
作者:
张廷干*
盐城师范学院马克思主义学院,224051
Author(s):
ZHANG Ting-gan
关键词:
“德—道”理型 自然—自由 心性秩序 形上建构
Keywords:
ideology mode of “Te-Tao” nature-freedom mind order metaphysical construction
摘要:
在天人之辨这一主题中,局限于对庄子哲学作“客观自然义”理解,遮蔽了其心性理论及其道德哲学主旨,即如何合乎人性化生存这一存在论与价值论问题。理解庄子的心性秩序建构需要把握其双重规定性,即“德-道”理型与“自然-自由”,前者构成心性秩序的本体性规定,后者则是庄子建构心性秩序的实践理性原则。在这样的理解中,自然与道德、个体性与普遍性、生命个体与伦理实体的关系及其内在张力获得伦理道德精神与心性秩序的精神还原。基于本体与现象的区分对自然与自由关系的探讨,庄子不仅深刻反思了人的道德存在本质从而呈现其存在论价值视阈,而且由对自然心性与现实人伦的深刻审察进一步敞开社会伦理向度这一重要的实践领域,探讨自然秩序与道德价值、自然心性与历史道义之间的关系,由此获得审视现代理性道德价值这一深刻的现代性论域。
Abstract:
Over the relationship between heaven and man, controversies have been confined to the understanding of Chuang-tzu’s philosophy from an objective naturalism perspective. This limitation obscures Chuang-tzu’s theory of mind and its implications for moral philosophy concerning the ontological and axiological issues about how people can lead a life in line with their human nature. In order to develop an adequate understanding of Chuang-tzu’s theory of mind order, it is necessary to grasp his two pairs of dichotomies, i.e. “Te德-Tao 道” and “Nature-Freedom”; the former constitutes the ontological dimension of mind order and the latter its practical principle. On this understanding, the tensions between nature and morality, between individuality and universality, and between individual life and moral entity can be reduced to the principles governing morality and mind order. Based on his distinction between noumenon and phenomenon and his investigation of the relationship between nature and freedom, Chuang-tzu did not only reflect profoundly on human moral existence and reveal its ontological dimensions, but also further opened the important practice dimension of social ethics by thoroughly examining natural mind and the ethics in reality. Thus his way of probing into the relationships between the natural order and the moral values and between natural mind and moral history can help us get a good vision for values of modern rational morality.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 哲学博士,盐城师范学院马克思主义学院,224051。本文受国家社会科学基金一般项目(13BKS055)、江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目(2012ZDIXM001)、江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究一般项目(2013SJB720011)资助。
更新日期/Last Update: 2014-10-05