[1]潘 林.金融创新与司法裁判:以我国“对赌协议”的案例、学说、实践为样本[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2013,(03):094.
　PAN Lin.Financial Innovation and Judicial Judgment: Discussions Based on Sample Case, Theory and Practice of “Valuation Adjustment Mechanism” in China[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2013,(03):094.
点击复制

金融创新与司法裁判:以我国“对赌协议”的案例、学说、实践为样本
分享到：

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年03期
页码:
094
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Financial Innovation and Judicial Judgment: Discussions Based on Sample Case, Theory and Practice of “Valuation Adjustment Mechanism” in China
作者:
潘 林*
Author(s):
PAN Lin
关键词:
金融创新;  司法裁判;  对赌协议;  射幸合同
Keywords:
judicial judgment;  valuation adjustment mechanism;  aleatory contract
摘要:
学界通说将“对赌协议”归为射幸合同不仅是合同法理论上的误读,也是对当事方交易的曲解。作为非典型合同,是否违背法律法规的禁止性规定和社会公共利益是判断特定协议效力的依据,其中社会公共利益具体化为债权人利益、证券市场公众投资者利益。“对赌协议”在我国的异化侵蚀了新兴的风险投资市场秩序。对此,司法裁判应当从风险投资家的尽职调查切入,可以通过诚实信用原则发挥司法裁判在金融创新中的引导和建构功能。
Abstract:
Theoretically, it is a misunderstanding of the contract law to categorize “valuation adjustment mechanism”(VAM)as an aleatory contract; in practice, this is also a misunderstanding of the nature of the transaction between the parties involved. As an atypical type of contract, VAM should be judged by whether it is against what the law prohibits or jeopardizes the public interests(specified as the interests of creditors and public investors in the securities market). The alienation of VAM in China has disturbed the order of the emerging venture capital market. The key to solving this problem lies in enhancing the guiding and constructive role played the judicial judgments through keeping under strict scrutiny the venture capitalists’ duty fulfillment and observing the principle of honesty and the spirit of fair play.

参考文献/References:

吕小康、汪新建,2012:《意象思维与躯体化症状:疾病表达的文化心理学途径》,《心理学报》第2期。
徐洁、张日昇,2007:《箱庭疗法应用于家庭治疗的理论背景与临床实践》,《心理科学》第1期。
赵芳,2010:《家庭治疗的发展:回顾与展望》,《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)第3期。
Borders, L. D.,1994, “Potential of DCT/SCDT in dressing two elusive themes of mental health counsel

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 法学博士,山东大学法学院讲师,山东大学法学博士后流动站研究人员,250100。本文为中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目(2012M521309)的部分研究成果。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-30