[1]王彩波 徐百军.政治义务的立与破:基于自愿主义的一种审视逻辑[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2013,(03):031.
 WANG Cai-bo,XU Bai-jun.Analyzing Political Obligation: An Review Based on Voluntarism[J].Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition),2013,(03):031.
点击复制

政治义务的立与破:基于自愿主义的一种审视逻辑
分享到:

《南京师大学报》(社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
期数:
2013年03期
页码:
031
栏目:
出版日期:
2013-05-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analyzing Political Obligation: An Review Based on Voluntarism
作者:
王彩波 徐百军*
Author(s):
WANG Cai-bo XU Bai-jun
关键词:
自愿主义 政治义务 多数同意 隐然同意
Keywords:
voluntarism political obligation majority consent tacit consent
摘要:
许多政治义务理论致力于证成公民个体具有服从政治共同体的政治义务,而自愿主义则是其中影响最大的一种。自愿主义政治义务理论的核心主旨在于:对于公民个体而言,政治义务必须是经过其本人同意的一种自愿承担。具体来说,自愿主义政治义务理论的这一理论内核贯穿于它的三个常规版本和两个修正版本之中,常规版本包括明示同意、假然同意与历史性同意,而多数同意与隐然同意则为其修正版本。与此同时,作为修正版本的隐然同意还涉及两个“应用特例”:一个是选举中的投票行为; 另一个是居住地默许行为。
Abstract:
Many theories of political obligation try to prove that individuals have a political obligation to obey the wills of the political community, and voluntarism is one of the most influential. The core idea of the voluntarist theory of political obligation is that for each individual citizen, political obligation must be a voluntary commitment based on his consent. To be specific, this idea is the thread running through the three conventional versions and two revised versions of this theory of political obligation: the conventional versions include express consent, hypothetical consent and historical consent; the revised ones include majority consent and tacit consent. At the same time, tacit consent as the core of the revised versions of the theory also involves two “application examples”: one is the voting behavior in the process of election; another is the tacit consent through residence.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
* 王彩波,吉林大学行政学院教授、博士生导师; 徐百军,吉林大学行政学院博士生,130012。本文为教育部人文社会科学规划项目“当代中国政治发展模式研究”(09YJA810008)的阶段成果之一。
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-06-30