|Table of Contents|

An Empirical Study on the Key Factors Influencing the Inter-Firm Dynamic Alliance Performance Conditioned by Asymmetric Information(PDF)

《南京师大学报》（社会科学版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

Issue:
2013年02期
Page:
46-
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
An Empirical Study on the Key Factors Influencing the Inter-Firm Dynamic Alliance Performance Conditioned by Asymmetric Information
Author(s):
CAO Ai-jun;  ZHANG Zong-qing
Keywords:
alliance performace;  information asymmetry;  commitment;  trust
PACS:
-
DOI:
-
Abstract:
To choose partners effectively has played a significant role in the successful construction and smooth operation of inter-firm dynamic alliance under the condition of information asymmetry. Thus, partners’ characteristics constitute key factors that influence the performance of inter-firm dynamic alliance. Given the current economic and cultural background of China, commitment, trust, control and capability are the main consideration of the leader of the alliance when there is an information asymmetry. Since the inter-firm dynamic alliance is usually built on a short-term basis, compatibility does not make a key factor behind the alliance performance. This paper analyzes the relations between the partners’ characteristics and the performance of inter-firm dynamic alliance. We conclude that commitment, trust, control and capability have the significant positive effect on the performance of alliances, but the effect of compatibility is insignificant, thus commitment, trust, control and capability forming the key factors influencing the alliance performance under the condition of asymmetric information.

References:

刘学、项晓峰、林耕,2006:《研发联盟中的初始信任与控制战略》,《管理世界》第11期。
沈灏、李垣,2010:《联盟关系、环境动态性对创新绩效的影响研究》,《科研管理》第31期。
Borm, P. G. and O. S. Tijs,1992, “On the Position Value for Communication Situations”, Journal of Discrete Math, vol.5, pp.305-320.
Das, T. K. and B. Teng,2001, “Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework”, Journal of Organization Studies, vol. 22, pp. 251-283.
De Laat, P. B.,1995, “Transaction Specificity in Technological Alliances: from Weakness to Strength”, Paper Presented at the 12TH Colloquium of the European Group of Organization Studies(EGOS),6-8 July.
Flam, S.D. and A. Jourani,2003, “Strategic Behavior and Partial Cost Sharing”, Journal of Games and Economic Behavior, vol.43, pp. 44-56.
Gilles, R. P., G. Owen and R. Brink,1992, “Games with Permission Structures: The Conjunctive Approach”, International Journal of Game Theory, vol. 20, pp. 277-293.
Hagen, R.,2002, “Globalization, University Transformation and Economic Regeneration: A UK Case Study of Public/private Sector Partnership”, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol.15, pp. 204-218.
Hartman, B. C., M. Dror and M. Shaked,2000, “Cores of Inventory Centralization Games”, Journal of Games and Economic Behavior, vol.31, pp. 26-49.
Inkpen, A. C. and S. C. Curtall,2004, “The Co-evolution of Trust,Control and Learning in Joint Ventures”, Journal of Organization Science, vol.15, pp.586-599.
Ono, M.,2007, “Learning and Evolution Affected by Spatial Structure”, Journal of Computer Science, vol.7, pp. 651-660.
Panisiri, J.,2007, “The effect of Characteristics of Partners on Strategic Alliance Performance in the SME Dominated Travel Sector”, Journal of Tourism Management,vol.3, pp.101-107.
Weisenfeld, U., et al.,2001, “Managing Technology as A Virtual Enterprise”, Journal of R&D Management, vol.31, pp. 35-45.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2013-04-30